maki/openairinterface5g
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Change PNF to use functions pointers to pack/unpack messages.

Browse Source 
Adds 3 new function pointers to the P5 and P7 PNF structures, allowing to configure which function to use to pack/unpack the messages, as well as unpack the message header, being then used seamlessly regardless of using the FAPI or nFAPI functions.

Changes the header unpack and message unpack functions to return true on success and false on failure, instead of an int
This commit is contained in:
Rúben Soares Silva
2025-06-26 16:57:08 +01:00
parent 1ea164468f
commit 00b5eba192
10 changed files with 178 additions and 103 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
openair2/NR_UE_PHY_INTERFACE/NR_IF_Module.c
+20 -24
View File
@@ -853,12 +853,11 @@ static void enqueue_nr_nfapi_msg(void *buffer, ssize_t len, nfapi_p7_message_hea
case NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_DL_TTI_REQUEST:
{
nfapi_nr_dl_tti_request_t *dl_tti_request = malloc16(sizeof(*dl_tti_request));
if (nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, dl_tti_request,
sizeof(*dl_tti_request), NULL) < 0)
{
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message dl_tti_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
const bool result = nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, dl_tti_request, sizeof(*dl_tti_request), NULL);
if (!result) {
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message dl_tti_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
LOG_D(NR_PHY, "Received an NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_DL_TTI_REQUEST message in sfn/slot %d %d. \n",
dl_tti_request->SFN, dl_tti_request->Slot);
@@ -877,12 +876,11 @@ static void enqueue_nr_nfapi_msg(void *buffer, ssize_t len, nfapi_p7_message_hea
case NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_TX_DATA_REQUEST:
{
nfapi_nr_tx_data_request_t *tx_data_request = malloc16(sizeof(*tx_data_request));
if (nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, tx_data_request,
sizeof(*tx_data_request), NULL) < 0)
{
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message tx_data_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
const bool result = nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, tx_data_request, sizeof(*tx_data_request), NULL);
if (!result) {
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message tx_data_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
LOG_D(NR_PHY, "Received an NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_TX_DATA_REQUEST message in SFN/slot %d %d. \n",
tx_data_request->SFN, tx_data_request->Slot);
if (!put_queue(&nr_tx_req_queue, tx_data_request))
@@ -897,12 +895,11 @@ static void enqueue_nr_nfapi_msg(void *buffer, ssize_t len, nfapi_p7_message_hea
case NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_UL_DCI_REQUEST:
{
nfapi_nr_ul_dci_request_t *ul_dci_request = malloc16(sizeof(*ul_dci_request));
if (nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, ul_dci_request,
sizeof(*ul_dci_request), NULL) < 0)
{
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message ul_dci_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
const bool result = nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, ul_dci_request, sizeof(*ul_dci_request), NULL);
if (!result) {
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message ul_dci_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
LOG_D(NR_PHY, "Received an NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_UL_DCI_REQUEST message in SFN/slot %d %d. \n",
ul_dci_request->SFN, ul_dci_request->Slot);
if (!put_queue(&nr_ul_dci_req_queue, ul_dci_request))
@@ -917,12 +914,11 @@ static void enqueue_nr_nfapi_msg(void *buffer, ssize_t len, nfapi_p7_message_hea
case NFAPI_NR_PHY_MSG_TYPE_UL_TTI_REQUEST:
{
nfapi_nr_ul_tti_request_t *ul_tti_request = malloc16(sizeof(*ul_tti_request));
if (nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, ul_tti_request,
sizeof(*ul_tti_request), NULL) < 0)
{
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message ul_tti_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
const bool result = nfapi_nr_p7_message_unpack(buffer, len, ul_tti_request, sizeof(*ul_tti_request), NULL);
if (!result) {
LOG_E(NR_PHY, "Message ul_tti_request failed to unpack\n");
break;
}
/* We are filtering UL_TTI_REQs below. We only care about UL_TTI_REQs that
will trigger sending a ul_harq (CRC/RX pair). This UL_TTI_REQ will have
NFAPI_NR_UL_CONFIG_PUSCH_PDU_TYPE. If we have not yet completed the CBRA/