Adaptations of the MAC scheduling to support FDD

- removed calls to the TDD UL/DL configuration common in FDD mode
- bugfix in the generation of prach info from index
- initial adaptation of gNB schedulers
- adapted PUCCH ack/nack scheduling by taking into account 6 slots min
  delay in FDD mode (to be integrated with latest development of PUCCH)
- made the use of nr_slots_per_frame more consistent
This commit is contained in:
Guido Casati
2021-11-05 16:05:01 +01:00
parent a722993724
commit 0286138f33
17 changed files with 178 additions and 129 deletions
+25 -22
View File
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ void process_rlcBearerConfig(struct NR_CellGroupConfig__rlc_BearerToAddModList *
struct NR_CellGroupConfig__rlc_BearerToReleaseList *rlc_bearer2release_list,
NR_UE_sched_ctrl_t *sched_ctrl) {
if (rlc_bearer2add_list)
// keep lcids
for (int i=0;i<rlc_bearer2add_list->list.count;i++) {
@@ -394,18 +395,17 @@ void config_common(int Mod_idP, int ssb_SubcarrierOffset, int pdsch_AntennaPorts
cfg->num_tlv++;
// TDD Table Configuration
//cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.value = scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity;
cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.tl.tag = NFAPI_NR_CONFIG_TDD_PERIOD_TAG;
cfg->num_tlv++;
if (scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1 == NULL)
cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.value = scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity;
else {
AssertFatal(scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1->dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity_v1530 != NULL,
"scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1->dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity_v1530 is null\n");
cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.value = *scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1->dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity_v1530;
}
if(cfg->cell_config.frame_duplex_type.value == TDD){
LOG_I(NR_MAC,"Setting TDD configuration period to %d\n",cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.value);
if (cfg->cell_config.frame_duplex_type.value == TDD){
cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.tl.tag = NFAPI_NR_CONFIG_TDD_PERIOD_TAG;
cfg->num_tlv++;
if (scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1 == NULL) {
cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.value = scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity;
} else {
AssertFatal(scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1->dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity_v1530 != NULL,
"In %s: scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1->dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity_v1530 is null\n", __FUNCTION__);
cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.value = *scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.ext1->dl_UL_TransmissionPeriodicity_v1530;
}
LOG_I(NR_MAC, "Setting TDD configuration period to %d\n", cfg->tdd_table.tdd_period.value);
int periods_per_frame = set_tdd_config_nr(cfg,
scc->uplinkConfigCommon->frequencyInfoUL->scs_SpecificCarrierList.list.array[0]->subcarrierSpacing,
scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1.nrofDownlinkSlots,
@@ -439,8 +439,7 @@ int rrc_mac_config_req_gNB(module_id_t Mod_idP,
AssertFatal((scc->ssb_PositionsInBurst->present > 0) && (scc->ssb_PositionsInBurst->present < 4), "SSB Bitmap type %d is not valid\n",scc->ssb_PositionsInBurst->present);
/* dimension UL_tti_req_ahead for number of slots in frame */
const uint8_t slots_per_frame[5] = {10, 20, 40, 80, 160};
const int n = slots_per_frame[*scc->ssbSubcarrierSpacing];
const int n = nr_slots_per_frame[*scc->ssbSubcarrierSpacing];
RC.nrmac[Mod_idP]->UL_tti_req_ahead[0] = calloc(n, sizeof(nfapi_nr_ul_tti_request_t));
AssertFatal(RC.nrmac[Mod_idP]->UL_tti_req_ahead[0],
"could not allocate memory for RC.nrmac[]->UL_tti_req_ahead[]\n");
@@ -490,19 +489,23 @@ int rrc_mac_config_req_gNB(module_id_t Mod_idP,
find_SSB_and_RO_available(Mod_idP);
const NR_TDD_UL_DL_Pattern_t *tdd = &scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1;
const int nr_mix_slots = tdd->nrofDownlinkSymbols != 0 || tdd->nrofUplinkSymbols != 0;
const int nr_slots_period = tdd->nrofDownlinkSlots + tdd->nrofUplinkSlots + nr_mix_slots;
const int nr_dlmix_slots = tdd->nrofDownlinkSlots + (tdd->nrofDownlinkSymbols != 0);
const int nr_ulstart_slot = tdd->nrofDownlinkSlots + (tdd->nrofUplinkSymbols == 0);
const NR_TDD_UL_DL_Pattern_t *tdd = scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon ? &scc->tdd_UL_DL_ConfigurationCommon->pattern1 : NULL;
const int nr_mix_slots = tdd ? tdd->nrofDownlinkSymbols != 0 || tdd->nrofUplinkSymbols != 0 : 0;
const int nr_slots_period = tdd ? tdd->nrofDownlinkSlots + tdd->nrofUplinkSlots + nr_mix_slots : n;
const int nr_dlmix_slots = tdd ? tdd->nrofDownlinkSlots + (tdd->nrofDownlinkSymbols != 0) : 0;
const int nr_dl_slots = tdd ? nr_dlmix_slots : n;
const int nr_ulstart_slot = tdd ? tdd->nrofDownlinkSlots + (tdd->nrofUplinkSymbols == 0) : 1;
for (int slot = 0; slot < n; ++slot) {
/* FIXME: it seems there is a problem with slot 0/10/slots right after UL:
* we just get retransmissions. Thus, do not schedule such slots in DL */
if (slot % nr_slots_period != 0)
RC.nrmac[Mod_idP]->dlsch_slot_bitmap[slot / 64] |= (uint64_t)((slot % nr_slots_period) < nr_dlmix_slots) << (slot % 64);
if (slot % nr_slots_period != 0){
RC.nrmac[Mod_idP]->dlsch_slot_bitmap[slot / 64] |= (uint64_t)((slot % nr_slots_period) < nr_dl_slots) << (slot % 64);
}
RC.nrmac[Mod_idP]->ulsch_slot_bitmap[slot / 64] |= (uint64_t)((slot % nr_slots_period) >= nr_ulstart_slot) << (slot % 64);
LOG_D(NR_MAC, "slot %d DL %d UL %d\n",
LOG_I(NR_MAC, "In %s: slot %d DL %d UL %d\n",
__FUNCTION__,
slot,
(RC.nrmac[Mod_idP]->dlsch_slot_bitmap[slot / 64] & ((uint64_t)1 << (slot % 64))) != 0,
(RC.nrmac[Mod_idP]->ulsch_slot_bitmap[slot / 64] & ((uint64_t)1 << (slot % 64))) != 0);