frame number synchronization at UE

This commit is contained in:
Francesco Mani
2020-01-15 14:19:17 +01:00
parent bbfa23e9cc
commit 06fa8e3699
15 changed files with 99 additions and 107 deletions
+15 -7
View File
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ void processSlotTX( PHY_VARS_NR_UE *UE, UE_nr_rxtx_proc_t *proc) {
rvidx = 0;
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------//
scheduled_response.ul_config->sfn_slot = NR_UPLINK_SLOT;
//scheduled_response.ul_config->sfn_slot = NR_UPLINK_SLOT;
scheduled_response.ul_config->number_pdus = 1;
scheduled_response.ul_config->ul_config_list[0].pdu_type = FAPI_NR_UL_CONFIG_TYPE_PUSCH;
scheduled_response.ul_config->ul_config_list[0].ulsch_config_pdu.rnti = n_rnti;
@@ -410,6 +410,7 @@ void processSlotRX( PHY_VARS_NR_UE *UE, UE_nr_rxtx_proc_t *proc) {
nr_dcireq_t dcireq;
nr_scheduled_response_t scheduled_response;
uint8_t ssb_period = UE->nrUE_config.ssb_table.ssb_period;
//program DCI for slot 1
//TODO: all of this has to be moved to the MAC!!!
@@ -427,6 +428,13 @@ void processSlotRX( PHY_VARS_NR_UE *UE, UE_nr_rxtx_proc_t *proc) {
scheduled_response.tx_request = NULL;
scheduled_response.module_id = UE->Mod_id;
scheduled_response.CC_id = 0;
if (!((proc->frame_rx)%(1<<(ssb_period-1)))) {
if(proc->frame_rx > dcireq.dl_config_req.sfn)
UE->frame_gap = proc->frame_rx - dcireq.dl_config_req.sfn;
if(proc->frame_rx < dcireq.dl_config_req.sfn)
UE->frame_gap = dcireq.dl_config_req.sfn - proc->frame_rx;
proc->frame_rx = dcireq.dl_config_req.sfn;
}
scheduled_response.frame = proc->frame_rx;
scheduled_response.slot = proc->nr_tti_rx;
@@ -618,7 +626,7 @@ void *UE_thread(void *arg) {
newNotifiedFIFO_elt(sizeof(processingData_t), 0,&nf,UE_processing));
bool syncRunning=false;
const int nb_slot_frame = 10*UE->frame_parms.slots_per_subframe;
const int nb_slot_frame = UE->frame_parms.slots_per_frame;
int absolute_slot=0, decoded_frame_rx=INT_MAX, trashed_frames=0;
while (!oai_exit) {
@@ -691,8 +699,8 @@ void *UE_thread(void *arg) {
curMsg->proc.subframe_rx=table_sf_slot[slot_nr];
curMsg->proc.nr_tti_tx = (absolute_slot + DURATION_RX_TO_TX) % nb_slot_frame;
curMsg->proc.subframe_tx=curMsg->proc.nr_tti_rx;
curMsg->proc.frame_rx = ( absolute_slot/nb_slot_frame ) % MAX_FRAME_NUMBER;
curMsg->proc.frame_tx = ( (absolute_slot + DURATION_RX_TO_TX) /nb_slot_frame ) % MAX_FRAME_NUMBER;
curMsg->proc.frame_rx = ((absolute_slot/nb_slot_frame)+UE->frame_gap) % MAX_FRAME_NUMBER;
curMsg->proc.frame_tx = (((absolute_slot+DURATION_RX_TO_TX)/nb_slot_frame)+UE->frame_gap) % MAX_FRAME_NUMBER;
curMsg->proc.decoded_frame_rx=-1;
//LOG_I(PHY,"Process slot %d thread Idx %d total gain %d\n", slot_nr, thread_idx, UE->rx_total_gain_dB);
@@ -735,9 +743,9 @@ void *UE_thread(void *arg) {
readBlockSize,
UE->frame_parms.nb_antennas_rx),"");
if (slot_nr==18)
AssertFatal( writeBlockSize ==
UE->rfdevice.trx_write_func(&UE->rfdevice,
if (slot_nr==18)
AssertFatal(writeBlockSize ==
UE->rfdevice.trx_write_func(&UE->rfdevice,
timestamp+
(DURATION_RX_TO_TX*UE->frame_parms.samples_per_slot) -
UE->frame_parms.ofdm_symbol_size-UE->frame_parms.nb_prefix_samples0 -