Adding comments for less confusion
This commit is contained in:
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static bool is_my_dl_config_req(const nfapi_dl_config_request_t *req)
|
|||||||
static int get_dlsch_pdu_indicies(const nfapi_dl_config_request_t *req, int *pdu_indicies, size_t max_pdu_indicies)
|
static int get_dlsch_pdu_indicies(const nfapi_dl_config_request_t *req, int *pdu_indicies, size_t max_pdu_indicies)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
const rnti_t my_rnti = UE_mac_inst[0].crnti;
|
const rnti_t my_rnti = UE_mac_inst[0].crnti; // This is 0 representing the num_ues is 1
|
||||||
int num_pdus = req->dl_config_request_body.number_pdu;
|
int num_pdus = req->dl_config_request_body.number_pdu;
|
||||||
size_t num_pdu_indicies = 0;
|
size_t num_pdu_indicies = 0;
|
||||||
for (int i = 0; i < num_pdus; i++)
|
for (int i = 0; i < num_pdus; i++)
|
||||||
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ int memcpy_tx_req(nfapi_pnf_p7_config_t *pnf_p7, nfapi_tx_request_t *req) {
|
|||||||
static bool is_my_hi_dci0_req(nfapi_hi_dci0_request_t *hi_dci0_req)
|
static bool is_my_hi_dci0_req(nfapi_hi_dci0_request_t *hi_dci0_req)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
bool is_my_rnti = false;
|
bool is_my_rnti = false;
|
||||||
const rnti_t rnti = UE_mac_inst[0].crnti;
|
const rnti_t rnti = UE_mac_inst[0].crnti; // This is 0 representing the num_ues is 1
|
||||||
nfapi_hi_dci0_request_body_t *hi_dci0_body = &hi_dci0_req->hi_dci0_request_body;
|
nfapi_hi_dci0_request_body_t *hi_dci0_body = &hi_dci0_req->hi_dci0_request_body;
|
||||||
for (int i = 0; i < hi_dci0_body->number_of_dci + hi_dci0_body->number_of_hi; i++)
|
for (int i = 0; i < hi_dci0_body->number_of_dci + hi_dci0_body->number_of_hi; i++)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user