name changing for L1

This commit is contained in:
Wang Tsu-Han
2018-10-24 16:07:21 +02:00
parent 09187015aa
commit 2104817a50
7 changed files with 146 additions and 142 deletions
+4 -4
View File
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ int pnf_phy_hi_dci0_req(nfapi_pnf_p7_config_t* pnf_p7, nfapi_hi_dci0_request_t*
//phy_info* phy = (phy_info*)(pnf_p7->user_data);
struct PHY_VARS_eNB_s *eNB = RC.eNB[0][0];
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc = &eNB->proc.proc_rxtx[0];
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc = &eNB->proc.L1_proc;
for (int i=0; i<req->hi_dci0_request_body.number_of_dci + req->hi_dci0_request_body.number_of_hi; i++) {
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ int pnf_phy_dl_config_req(nfapi_pnf_p7_config_t* pnf_p7, nfapi_dl_config_request
int sf = NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(req->sfn_sf);
struct PHY_VARS_eNB_s *eNB = RC.eNB[0][0];
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc = &eNB->proc.proc_rxtx[0];
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc = &eNB->proc.L1_proc;
nfapi_dl_config_request_pdu_t* dl_config_pdu_list = req->dl_config_request_body.dl_config_pdu_list;
LTE_eNB_PDCCH *pdcch_vars = &eNB->pdcch_vars[sf&1];
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ int pnf_phy_dl_config_req(nfapi_pnf_p7_config_t* pnf_p7, nfapi_dl_config_request
//NFAPI_TRACE(NFAPI_TRACE_INFO, "%s() DLSCH:pdu_index:%d handle_nfapi_dlsch_pdu(eNB, proc_rxtx, dlsch_pdu, transport_blocks:%d sdu:%p) eNB->pdcch_vars[proc->subframe_tx & 1].num_pdcch_symbols:%d\n", __FUNCTION__, rel8_pdu->pdu_index, rel8_pdu->transport_blocks, dlsch_sdu, eNB->pdcch_vars[proc->subframe_tx & 1].num_pdcch_symbols);
handle_nfapi_dlsch_pdu( eNB, sfn,sf, &eNB->proc.proc_rxtx[0], &dl_config_pdu_list[i], rel8_pdu->transport_blocks-1, dlsch_sdu);
handle_nfapi_dlsch_pdu( eNB, sfn,sf, &eNB->proc.L1_proc, &dl_config_pdu_list[i], rel8_pdu->transport_blocks-1, dlsch_sdu);
} else {
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ int pnf_phy_ul_config_req(nfapi_pnf_p7_config_t* pnf_p7, nfapi_ul_config_request
uint16_t curr_sf = NFAPI_SFNSF2SF(req->sfn_sf);
struct PHY_VARS_eNB_s *eNB = RC.eNB[0][0];
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc = &eNB->proc.proc_rxtx[0];
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc = &eNB->proc.L1_proc;
nfapi_ul_config_request_pdu_t* ul_config_pdu_list = req->ul_config_request_body.ul_config_pdu_list;
for (int i=0;i<req->ul_config_request_body.number_of_pdus;i++) {
+13 -13
View File
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) {
eNB_proc_t *proc=&eNB->proc;
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *proc_rxtx=&proc->proc_rxtx[sf&1];
eNB_rxtx_proc_t *L1_proc= (sf&1)? &proc->L1_proc : &proc->L1_proc_tx;
LTE_DL_FRAME_PARMS *fp = &eNB->frame_parms;
@@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) {
// wake up TX for subframe n+sf_ahead
// lock the TX mutex and make sure the thread is ready
if (pthread_mutex_timedlock(&proc_rxtx->mutex_rxtx,&wait) != 0) {
LOG_E( PHY, "[eNB] ERROR pthread_mutex_lock for eNB RXTX thread %d (IC %d)\n", proc_rxtx->subframe_rx&1,proc_rxtx->instance_cnt_rxtx );
if (pthread_mutex_timedlock(&L1_proc->mutex,&wait) != 0) {
LOG_E( PHY, "[eNB] ERROR pthread_mutex_lock for eNB RXTX thread %d (IC %d)\n", L1_proc->subframe_rx&1,L1_proc->instance_cnt );
exit_fun( "error locking mutex_rxtx" );
return(-1);
}
@@ -379,9 +379,9 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) {
if (old_sf == 0 && old_sfn % 100==0) LOG_W( PHY,"[eNB] sfn/sf:%d%d old_sfn/sf:%d%d proc[rx:%d%d]\n", sfn, sf, old_sfn, old_sf, proc->frame_rx, proc->subframe_rx);
}
++proc_rxtx->instance_cnt_rxtx;
++L1_proc->instance_cnt;
//LOG_D( PHY,"[VNF-subframe_ind] sfn/sf:%d:%d proc[frame_rx:%d subframe_rx:%d] proc_rxtx->instance_cnt_rxtx:%d \n", sfn, sf, proc->frame_rx, proc->subframe_rx, proc_rxtx->instance_cnt_rxtx);
//LOG_D( PHY,"[VNF-subframe_ind] sfn/sf:%d:%d proc[frame_rx:%d subframe_rx:%d] L1_proc->instance_cnt_rxtx:%d \n", sfn, sf, proc->frame_rx, proc->subframe_rx, L1_proc->instance_cnt_rxtx);
// We have just received and processed the common part of a subframe, say n.
// TS_rx is the last received timestamp (start of 1st slot), TS_tx is the desired
@@ -389,23 +389,23 @@ int wake_eNB_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB, uint16_t sfn, uint16_t sf) {
// The last (TS_rx mod samples_per_frame) was n*samples_per_tti,
// we want to generate subframe (n+N), so TS_tx = TX_rx+N*samples_per_tti,
// and proc->subframe_tx = proc->subframe_rx+sf_ahead
proc_rxtx->timestamp_tx = proc->timestamp_rx + (sf_ahead*fp->samples_per_tti);
proc_rxtx->frame_rx = proc->frame_rx;
proc_rxtx->subframe_rx = proc->subframe_rx;
proc_rxtx->frame_tx = (proc_rxtx->subframe_rx > (9-sf_ahead)) ? (proc_rxtx->frame_rx+1)&1023 : proc_rxtx->frame_rx;
proc_rxtx->subframe_tx = (proc_rxtx->subframe_rx + sf_ahead)%10;
L1_proc->timestamp_tx = proc->timestamp_rx + (sf_ahead*fp->samples_per_tti);
L1_proc->frame_rx = proc->frame_rx;
L1_proc->subframe_rx = proc->subframe_rx;
L1_proc->frame_tx = (L1_proc->subframe_rx > (9-sf_ahead)) ? (L1_proc->frame_rx+1)&1023 : L1_proc->frame_rx;
L1_proc->subframe_tx = (L1_proc->subframe_rx + sf_ahead)%10;
//LOG_D(PHY, "sfn/sf:%d%d proc[rx:%d%d] proc_rxtx[instance_cnt_rxtx:%d rx:%d%d] About to wake rxtx thread\n\n", sfn, sf, proc->frame_rx, proc->subframe_rx, proc_rxtx->instance_cnt_rxtx, proc_rxtx->frame_rx, proc_rxtx->subframe_rx);
//LOG_D(PHY, "sfn/sf:%d%d proc[rx:%d%d] L1_proc[instance_cnt_rxtx:%d rx:%d%d] About to wake rxtx thread\n\n", sfn, sf, proc->frame_rx, proc->subframe_rx, L1_proc->instance_cnt_rxtx, L1_proc->frame_rx, L1_proc->subframe_rx);
// the thread can now be woken up
if (pthread_cond_signal(&proc_rxtx->cond_rxtx) != 0) {
if (pthread_cond_signal(&L1_proc->cond) != 0) {
LOG_E( PHY, "[eNB] ERROR pthread_cond_signal for eNB RXn-TXnp4 thread\n");
exit_fun( "ERROR pthread_cond_signal" );
return(-1);
}
//LOG_D(PHY,"%s() About to attempt pthread_mutex_unlock\n", __FUNCTION__);
pthread_mutex_unlock( &proc_rxtx->mutex_rxtx );
pthread_mutex_unlock( &L1_proc->mutex );
//LOG_D(PHY,"%s() UNLOCKED pthread_mutex_unlock\n", __FUNCTION__);
return(0);