merge nfapi_cleanup

This commit is contained in:
frtabu
2019-04-05 18:43:40 +02:00
parent cc4aeb6a0c
commit 30b7c973e0
44 changed files with 10154 additions and 11201 deletions
+44 -71
View File
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
#include "common/ran_context.h"
#if defined(ENABLE_ITTI)
# include "intertask_interface.h"
#include "intertask_interface.h"
#endif
//#define RRC_DATA_REQ_DEBUG
@@ -49,21 +49,21 @@ extern RAN_CONTEXT_t RC;
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
uint8_t
rrc_data_req(
const protocol_ctxt_t* const ctxt_pP,
const protocol_ctxt_t *const ctxt_pP,
const rb_id_t rb_idP,
const mui_t muiP,
const confirm_t confirmP,
const sdu_size_t sdu_sizeP,
uint8_t* const buffer_pP,
uint8_t *const buffer_pP,
const pdcp_transmission_mode_t modeP
)
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
if(sdu_sizeP == 255)
{
if(sdu_sizeP == 255) {
LOG_I(RRC,"sdu_sizeP == 255");
return FALSE;
}
MSC_LOG_TX_MESSAGE(
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? MSC_RRC_ENB : MSC_RRC_UE,
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? MSC_PDCP_ENB : MSC_PDCP_UE,
@@ -74,71 +74,49 @@ rrc_data_req(
ctxt_pP->rnti,
muiP,
sdu_sizeP);
MessageDef *message_p;
// Uses a new buffer to avoid issue with PDCP buffer content that could be changed by PDCP (asynchronous message handling).
uint8_t *message_buffer;
message_buffer = itti_malloc (
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_RRC_ENB : TASK_RRC_UE,
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_PDCP_ENB : TASK_PDCP_UE,
sdu_sizeP);
memcpy (message_buffer, buffer_pP, sdu_sizeP);
message_p = itti_alloc_new_message (ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_RRC_ENB : TASK_RRC_UE, RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ);
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).frame = ctxt_pP->frame;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).enb_flag = ctxt_pP->enb_flag;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).rb_id = rb_idP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).muip = muiP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).confirmp = confirmP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).sdu_size = sdu_sizeP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).sdu_p = message_buffer;
//memcpy (RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).sdu_p, buffer_pP, sdu_sizeP);
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).mode = modeP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).module_id = ctxt_pP->module_id;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).rnti = ctxt_pP->rnti;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).eNB_index = ctxt_pP->eNB_index;
itti_send_msg_to_task (
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_PDCP_ENB : TASK_PDCP_UE,
ctxt_pP->instance,
message_p);
LOG_I(RRC,"sent RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ to TASK_PDCP_ENB\n");
#if defined(ENABLE_ITTI)
{
MessageDef *message_p;
// Uses a new buffer to avoid issue with PDCP buffer content that could be changed by PDCP (asynchronous message handling).
uint8_t *message_buffer;
/* Hack: only trigger PDCP if in CU, otherwise it is triggered by RU threads
* Ideally, PDCP would not neet to be triggered like this but react to ITTI
* messages automatically */
if (ctxt_pP->enb_flag && NODE_IS_CU(RC.rrc[ctxt_pP->module_id]->node_type))
pdcp_run(ctxt_pP);
message_buffer = itti_malloc (
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_RRC_ENB : TASK_RRC_UE,
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_PDCP_ENB : TASK_PDCP_UE,
sdu_sizeP);
memcpy (message_buffer, buffer_pP, sdu_sizeP);
message_p = itti_alloc_new_message (ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_RRC_ENB : TASK_RRC_UE, RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ);
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).frame = ctxt_pP->frame;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).enb_flag = ctxt_pP->enb_flag;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).rb_id = rb_idP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).muip = muiP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).confirmp = confirmP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).sdu_size = sdu_sizeP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).sdu_p = message_buffer;
//memcpy (RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).sdu_p, buffer_pP, sdu_sizeP);
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).mode = modeP;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).module_id = ctxt_pP->module_id;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).rnti = ctxt_pP->rnti;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ (message_p).eNB_index = ctxt_pP->eNB_index;
itti_send_msg_to_task (
ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_PDCP_ENB : TASK_PDCP_UE,
ctxt_pP->instance,
message_p);
LOG_I(RRC,"sent RRC_DCCH_DATA_REQ to TASK_PDCP_ENB\n");
#ifndef UETARGET
/* Hack: only trigger PDCP if in CU, otherwise it is triggered by RU threads
* Ideally, PDCP would not neet to be triggered like this but react to ITTI
* messages automatically */
if (NODE_IS_CU(RC.rrc[ctxt_pP->module_id]->node_type))
pdcp_run(ctxt_pP);
#endif
return TRUE; // TODO should be changed to a CNF message later, currently RRC lite does not used the returned value anyway.
}
#else
return pdcp_data_req (
ctxt_pP,
SRB_FLAG_YES,
rb_idP,
muiP,
confirmP,
sdu_sizeP,
buffer_pP,
modeP);
#endif
return TRUE; // TODO should be changed to a CNF message later, currently RRC lite does not used the returned value anyway.
}
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
void
rrc_data_ind(
const protocol_ctxt_t* const ctxt_pP,
const protocol_ctxt_t *const ctxt_pP,
const rb_id_t Srb_id,
const sdu_size_t sdu_sizeP,
const uint8_t* const buffer_pP
const uint8_t *const buffer_pP
)
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
@@ -162,10 +140,8 @@ rrc_data_ind(
MessageDef *message_p;
// Uses a new buffer to avoid issue with PDCP buffer content that could be changed by PDCP (asynchronous message handling).
uint8_t *message_buffer;
message_buffer = itti_malloc (ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_PDCP_ENB : TASK_PDCP_UE, ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_RRC_ENB : TASK_RRC_UE, sdu_sizeP);
memcpy (message_buffer, buffer_pP, sdu_sizeP);
message_p = itti_alloc_new_message (ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_PDCP_ENB : TASK_PDCP_UE, RRC_DCCH_DATA_IND);
RRC_DCCH_DATA_IND (message_p).frame = ctxt_pP->frame;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_IND (message_p).dcch_index = DCCH_index;
@@ -174,16 +150,13 @@ rrc_data_ind(
RRC_DCCH_DATA_IND (message_p).rnti = ctxt_pP->rnti;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_IND (message_p).module_id = ctxt_pP->module_id;
RRC_DCCH_DATA_IND (message_p).eNB_index = ctxt_pP->eNB_index;
itti_send_msg_to_task (ctxt_pP->enb_flag ? TASK_RRC_ENB : TASK_RRC_UE, ctxt_pP->instance, message_p);
}
#else
rrc_eNB_decode_dcch(
ctxt_pP,
DCCH_index,
buffer_pP,
sdu_sizeP);
rrc_eNB_decode_dcch(
ctxt_pP,
DCCH_index,
buffer_pP,
sdu_sizeP);
#endif
}