WIP: develop-nr is current as of 8.7.19
This commit is contained in:
@@ -72,14 +72,15 @@ int handle_dci(module_id_t module_id, int cc_id, unsigned int gNB_index, fapi_nr
|
||||
// L2 Abstraction Layer
|
||||
int8_t handle_dlsch (module_id_t module_id, int cc_id, uint8_t gNB_index, fapi_nr_dci_indication_t *dci_ind, uint8_t *pduP, uint32_t pdu_len){
|
||||
|
||||
// return 0;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
return nr_ue_process_dlsch( module_id,
|
||||
cc_id,
|
||||
gNB_index,
|
||||
dci_ind,
|
||||
pduP,
|
||||
pdu_len);
|
||||
|
||||
*/
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int nr_ue_ul_indication(nr_uplink_indication_t *ul_info){
|
||||
@@ -156,6 +157,9 @@ int nr_ue_dl_indication(nr_downlink_indication_t *dl_info){
|
||||
(dl_info->dci_ind->dci_list+i)->rnti,
|
||||
(dl_info->dci_ind->dci_list+i)->dci_format)) << FAPI_NR_DCI_IND;
|
||||
|
||||
AssertFatal( nr_ue_if_module_inst[module_id] != NULL, "IF module is void!\n" );
|
||||
nr_ue_if_module_inst[module_id]->scheduled_response(&mac->scheduled_response);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*switch((dl_info->dci_ind->dci_list+i)->dci_type){
|
||||
case FAPI_NR_DCI_TYPE_0_0:
|
||||
@@ -242,9 +246,6 @@ int nr_ue_dl_indication(nr_downlink_indication_t *dl_info){
|
||||
dl_info->rx_ind = NULL;
|
||||
dl_info->dci_ind = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
AssertFatal( nr_ue_if_module_inst[module_id] != NULL, "IF module is void!\n" );
|
||||
nr_ue_if_module_inst[module_id]->scheduled_response(&mac->scheduled_response);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ typedef struct {
|
||||
frame_t frame;
|
||||
/// slot
|
||||
int slot;
|
||||
/// proc is needed to signal back decoded frame number to PHY. However, this is not really FAPI procedure and should be done differently
|
||||
UE_nr_rxtx_proc_t * proc;
|
||||
|
||||
/// NR UE FAPI-like P7 message, direction: L1 to L2
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user