Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix_NR_DLUL_PF' into integration_2021_wk12

This commit is contained in:
Robert Schmidt
2021-03-30 10:48:57 +02:00
parent 77c36950d4
commit 576df55450
46 changed files with 1660 additions and 1410 deletions
+38 -32
View File
@@ -171,24 +171,31 @@ NR_sched_pusch_t (for values changing every TTI, e.g., frequency domain
allocation) and NR_sched_pusch_save_t (for values changing less frequently, at
least in FR1 [to my understanding], e.g., DMRS fields when the time domain
allocation stays between TTIs) structures. Furthermore, the preprocessor is an
exchangeable module that might schedule differently, e.g., one user for
phytest, multiple users in FR1, or maybe FR2: phytest is in
nr_ul_preprocessor_phytest(), for FR1 is nr_simple_ulsch_preprocessor() [under
development], for FR2 does not exist yet.
exchangeable module that schedules differently based on a particular
use-case/deployment type, e.g., one user for phytest [in
nr_ul_preprocessor_phytest()], multiple users in FR1
[nr_fr1_ulsch_preprocessor()], or maybe FR2 [does not exist yet]:
* calls preprocessor via pre_processor_ul(): the preprocessor is responsible
for allocating CCEs (using allocate_nr_CCEs()). Note that we do not yet have
scheduling requests or buffer status reports, and only one UE. E.g.,
nr_simple_ulsch_preprocessor():
for allocating CCEs (using allocate_nr_CCEs()) and deciding on resource
allocation for the UEs including TB size. Note that we do not yet have
scheduling requests. What it typically does:
1) check whether the current frame/slot plus K2 is an UL slot, and return if
not.
2) Find first free start RB in vrb_map_UL, and as many free consecutive RBs
as possible.
3) allocate a CCE for the UE (and return if it is not possible)
4) Calculate DMRS stuff (nr_save_pusch_fields()) and the TBS.
5) Mark used resources in vrb_map_UL.
* loop through all users: get a free HARQ PID and
update statistics. Fill nFAPI structures directly for PUSCH, and call
config_uldci() and fill_dci_pdu_rel15() for DCI filling and PDCCH messages.
3) Either set up resource allocation directly (e.g., for a single UE,
phytest), or call into a function to perform actual resource allocation.
Currently, this is done using pf_ul() which implements a basic
proportional fair scheduler:
* for every UE, check for retransmission and allocate as necessary
* Calculate DMRS stuff (nr_set_pusch_semi_static())
* Calculate the PF coefficient and put eligible UEs into a list
* Allocate resources to the UE(s) with the highest coefficient
4) Mark used resources in vrb_map_UL.
* loop through all users: get a HARQ process as indicated through the
preprocessor, update statistics, fill nFAPI structures directly for PUSCH,
and call config_uldci() and fill_dci_pdu_rel15() for DCI filling and PDCCH
messages.
Calls nr_schedule_ue_spec(). It is divided into the "preprocessor" and the
"postprocessor": the first makes the scheduling decisions, the second fills
@@ -196,29 +203,28 @@ nFAPI structures to indicate to the PHY what it is supposed to do. To signal
which users have how many resources, the preprocessor populates the
NR_UE_sched_ctrl_t structure of affected users. In particular, the field rbSize
decides whether a user is to be allocated. Furthermore, the preprocessor is an
exchangeable module that might schedule differently, e.g., one user for
phytest, multiple users in FR1, or maybe FR2: phytest is in
nr_preprocessor_phytest(), for FR1 is nr_simple_dlsch_preprocessor() [under
development], for FR2 does not exist yet.
exchangeable module that schedules differently based on a particular
use-case/deployment type, e.g., one user for phytest [in
nr_preprocessor_phytest()], multiple users in FR1
[nr_fr1_dlsch_preprocessor()], or maybe FR2 [does not exist yet].
* calls preprocessor via pre_processor_dl(): the preprocessor is responsible
for allocating CCEs and PUCCH (using allocate_nr_CCEs() and
nr_acknack_scheduling()) and deciding on the frequency/time domain
allocation. E.g., nr_simple_dlsch_preprocessor():
1) mac_rlc_status_ind() locks and checks directly inside rlc data the
quantity of waiting data.
2) return from the preprocessor if there is no data and no timing advance to
send,
3) otherwise, allocate a CCE for the UE (and return if it is not possible)
4) find a PUCCH occasion for HARQ
5a) check if there is a retransmission: if yes, find free resources to
transmit using the same resources, else
5b) calculate the necessary RBs needed to get a TBS large enough to hold all
data, or until no more resources are available
6) Mark taken resources in the vrb_map
allocation including the TB size. What it typically does:
1) Check available resources in the vrb_map
2) Checks the quantity of waiting data in RLC
3) Either set up resource allocation directly (e.g., for a single UE,
phytest), or call into a function to perform actual resource allocation.
Currently, this is done using pf_dl() which implements a basic
proportional fair scheduler:
* for every UE, check for retransmission and allocate as necessary
* Calculate the PF coefficient and put eligible UEs into a list
* Allocate resources to the UE(s) with the highest coefficient
4) Mark taken resources in the vrb_map
* loop through all users: check if a new TA is necessary. Then, if a user has
allocated resources, compute its TBS, and fill nFAPI structures
(nr_fill_nfapi_dl_pdu() to populate what should be done by the lower layers
to make the Tx subframe). Update statistics (round, sent bytes).
allocated resources, update statistics (round, sent bytes), update HARQ
process information, and fill nFAPI structures (allocate a DCI and PDCCH
messages, TX_req, ...)
# RRC
RRC is a regular thread with itti loop on queue: TASK_RRC_GNB