benetel: driver for Benetel's 4G and 5G RRUs
This commit contains work done by Eurecom and by Benetel.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -804,7 +804,37 @@ void dl_config_req_UE_MAC_dci(int sfn,
|
||||
UE_mac_inst[ue_id].first_ULSCH_Tx = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
}
|
||||
//else if (dl_config_pdu_list[i].pdu_type == NFAPI_DL_CONFIG_BCH_PDU_TYPE) {
|
||||
// // BCH case: Last parameter is 1 if first time synchronization and zero
|
||||
// // otherwise. Not sure which value to put for our case.
|
||||
// if (UE_mac_inst[Mod_id].UE_mode[0] == NOT_SYNCHED){
|
||||
// dl_phy_sync_success(Mod_id, sfn, 0, 1);
|
||||
// LOG_E(MAC,
|
||||
// "%s(): Received MIB: UE_mode: %d, sfn/sf: %d.%d\n",
|
||||
// __func__,
|
||||
// UE_mac_inst[Mod_id].UE_mode[0],
|
||||
// sfn,
|
||||
// sf);
|
||||
// UE_mac_inst[Mod_id].UE_mode[0] = PRACH;
|
||||
// } else {
|
||||
// dl_phy_sync_success(Mod_id, sfn, 0, 0);
|
||||
// }
|
||||
//} else if (dl_config_pdu_list[i].pdu_type == NFAPI_DL_CONFIG_MCH_PDU_TYPE){
|
||||
// if (UE_mac_inst[Mod_id].UE_mode[0] == NOT_SYNCHED) {
|
||||
// /* this check is in the code before refactoring, but I don't know
|
||||
// * why. Leave it in here for the moment */
|
||||
// continue;
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// nfapi_dl_config_request_pdu_t *dl_config_pdu_tmp = &dl_config_pdu_list[i];
|
||||
// const int pdu_index = dl_config_pdu_tmp->dlsch_pdu.dlsch_pdu_rel8.pdu_index;
|
||||
// ue_send_mch_sdu(Mod_id, 0, sfn,
|
||||
// tx_request_pdu_list[pdu_index].segments[0].segment_data,
|
||||
// tx_request_pdu_list[pdu_index].segments[0].segment_length,
|
||||
// 0,0);
|
||||
|
||||
//}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
LOG_W(MAC, "can not handle special RNTI %x\n", rnti);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user