Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/tpool-nospinlock' into integration_2025_w03 (!3193)
Remove spinlock from threadpool task return The idea to use atomic aligned to cache line for counting finished jobs is reused, but instead of polling a semaphore was added.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -26,37 +26,50 @@
|
||||
#include <stdint.h>
|
||||
#include <stdlib.h>
|
||||
#include <time.h>
|
||||
#include "pthread_utils.h"
|
||||
#include "errno.h"
|
||||
#include <string.h>
|
||||
|
||||
void completed_task_ans(task_ans_t* task)
|
||||
#define seminit(sem) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
int ret = sem_init(&sem, 0, 0); \
|
||||
AssertFatal(ret == 0, "sem_init(): ret=%d, errno=%d (%s)\n", ret, errno, strerror(errno)); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
#define sempost(sem) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
int ret = sem_post(&sem); \
|
||||
AssertFatal(ret == 0, "sem_post(): ret=%d, errno=%d (%s)\n", ret, errno, strerror(errno)); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
#define semwait(sem) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
int ret = sem_wait(&sem); \
|
||||
AssertFatal(ret == 0, "sem_wait(): ret=%d, errno=%d (%s)\n", ret, errno, strerror(errno)); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
#define semdestroy(sem) \
|
||||
{ \
|
||||
int ret = sem_destroy(&sem); \
|
||||
AssertFatal(ret == 0, "sem_destroy(): ret=%d, errno=%d (%s)\n", ret, errno, strerror(errno)); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void init_task_ans(task_ans_t* ans, uint num_jobs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DevAssert(task != NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
int status = atomic_load_explicit(&task->status, memory_order_acquire);
|
||||
AssertFatal(status == 0, "Task not expected to be finished here. Status = %d\n", status);
|
||||
|
||||
atomic_store_explicit(&task->status, 1, memory_order_release);
|
||||
ans->counter = num_jobs;
|
||||
seminit(ans->sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void join_task_ans(task_ans_t* arr, size_t len)
|
||||
void completed_many_task_ans(task_ans_t* ans, uint num_completed_jobs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DevAssert(len < INT_MAX);
|
||||
DevAssert(arr != NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
// Spin lock inspired by:
|
||||
// The Art of Writing Efficient Programs:
|
||||
// An advanced programmer's guide to efficient hardware utilization
|
||||
// and compiler optimizations using C++ examples
|
||||
const struct timespec ns = {0, 1};
|
||||
uint64_t i = 0;
|
||||
int j = len - 1;
|
||||
for (; j != -1; i++) {
|
||||
for (; j != -1; --j) {
|
||||
int const task_completed = 1;
|
||||
if (atomic_load_explicit(&arr[j].status, memory_order_acquire) != task_completed)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (i % 8 == 0) {
|
||||
nanosleep(&ns, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
DevAssert(ans != NULL);
|
||||
// Using atomic counter in contention scenario to avoid locking in producers
|
||||
int num_jobs = atomic_fetch_sub_explicit(&ans->counter, num_completed_jobs, memory_order_relaxed);
|
||||
if (num_jobs == num_completed_jobs) {
|
||||
// Using semaphore to enable blocking call in join_task_ans
|
||||
sempost(ans->sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void join_task_ans(task_ans_t* ans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
semwait(ans->sem);
|
||||
semdestroy(ans->sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef TASK_ANSWER_THREAD_POOL_H
|
||||
#define TASK_ANSWER_THREAD_POOL_H
|
||||
|
||||
#include "pthread_utils.h"
|
||||
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
||||
extern "C" {
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern "C" {
|
||||
|
||||
#include <stddef.h>
|
||||
#include <stdint.h>
|
||||
#include <semaphore.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
|
||||
#define LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE 64
|
||||
@@ -52,9 +53,17 @@ extern "C" {
|
||||
#error Unknown CPU architecture
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/** @brief
|
||||
* A multi-producer - single-consumer synchronization mechanism built for efficiency under
|
||||
* contention.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param sem semaphore to wait on
|
||||
* @param counter atomic counter to keep track of the number of tasks completed. Atomic counter
|
||||
* is used for efficiency under contention.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
typedef struct {
|
||||
// Avoid false sharing
|
||||
_Alignas(LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE) _Atomic(int) status;
|
||||
sem_t sem;
|
||||
_Alignas(LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE) _Atomic(int) counter;
|
||||
} task_ans_t;
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct {
|
||||
@@ -64,10 +73,29 @@ typedef struct {
|
||||
task_ans_t* ans;
|
||||
} thread_info_tm_t;
|
||||
|
||||
/// @brief Initialize a task_ans_t struct
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// @param ans task_ans_t struct
|
||||
/// @param num_jobs number of tasks to wait for
|
||||
void init_task_ans(task_ans_t* ans, unsigned int num_jobs);
|
||||
|
||||
void join_task_ans(task_ans_t* arr, size_t len);
|
||||
/// @brief Wait for all tasks to complete
|
||||
/// @param ans task_ans_t struct
|
||||
void join_task_ans(task_ans_t* arr);
|
||||
|
||||
void completed_task_ans(task_ans_t* task);
|
||||
/// @brief Mark a number of tasks as completed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// @param ans task_ans_t struct
|
||||
/// @param num_completed_jobs number of tasks to mark as completed
|
||||
void completed_many_task_ans(task_ans_t* ans, uint num_completed_jobs);
|
||||
|
||||
/// @brief Mark 1 tasks as completed.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// @param ans task_ans_t struct
|
||||
static inline void completed_task_ans(task_ans_t* ans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
completed_many_task_ans(ans, 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef __cplusplus
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -114,18 +114,18 @@ int main()
|
||||
int nb_jobs = 4;
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
|
||||
int parall = nb_jobs;
|
||||
task_ans_t task_ans[parall];
|
||||
memset(task_ans, 0, sizeof(task_ans));
|
||||
task_ans_t task_ans;
|
||||
init_task_ans(&task_ans, parall);
|
||||
struct testData test_data[parall];
|
||||
memset(test_data, 0, sizeof(test_data));
|
||||
for (int j = 0; j < parall; j++) {
|
||||
task_t task = {.args = &test_data[j], .func = processing};
|
||||
struct testData *x = (struct testData *)task.args;
|
||||
x->id = i;
|
||||
x->task_ans = &task_ans[j];
|
||||
x->task_ans = &task_ans;
|
||||
pushTpool(&pool, task);
|
||||
}
|
||||
join_task_ans(task_ans, parall);
|
||||
join_task_ans(&task_ans);
|
||||
int sleepmax = 0;
|
||||
for (int j = 0; j < parall; j++) {
|
||||
if (test_data[j].sleepTime > sleepmax) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user