process ID overflow bugfix
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1253,8 +1253,8 @@ int pnf_phy_dl_tti_req(gNB_L1_rxtx_proc_t *proc, nfapi_pnf_p7_config_t *pnf_p7,
|
||||
} else if (dl_tti_pdu_list[i].PDUType == NFAPI_NR_DL_TTI_PDSCH_PDU_TYPE) {
|
||||
nfapi_nr_dl_tti_pdsch_pdu *pdsch_pdu = &dl_tti_pdu_list[i].pdsch_pdu;
|
||||
nfapi_nr_dl_tti_pdsch_pdu_rel15_t *rel15_pdu = &pdsch_pdu->pdsch_pdu_rel15;
|
||||
//nfapi_nr_tx_data_request_t *tx_data = tx_data_request[sfn][slot][rel15_pdu->pduIndex];
|
||||
nfapi_nr_pdu_t *tx_data = tx_data_request[sfn][slot][0];
|
||||
//nfapi_nr_tx_data_request_t *tx_data = tx_data_request[sfn][slot][rel15_pdu->pduIndex];
|
||||
nfapi_nr_pdu_t *tx_data = tx_data_request[sfn][slot][rel15_pdu->pduIndex];
|
||||
|
||||
if (tx_data != NULL) {
|
||||
int UE_id = find_nr_dlsch(rel15_pdu->rnti,gNB,SEARCH_EXIST_OR_FREE);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1620,8 +1620,8 @@ void configure_nr_nfapi_vnf(char *vnf_addr, int vnf_p5_port) {
|
||||
nfapi_setmode(NFAPI_MODE_VNF);
|
||||
memset(&vnf, 0, sizeof(vnf));
|
||||
memset(vnf.p7_vnfs, 0, sizeof(vnf.p7_vnfs));
|
||||
vnf.p7_vnfs[0].timing_window = 32;
|
||||
vnf.p7_vnfs[0].periodic_timing_enabled = 1;
|
||||
vnf.p7_vnfs[0].timing_window = 30;
|
||||
vnf.p7_vnfs[0].periodic_timing_enabled = 0;
|
||||
vnf.p7_vnfs[0].aperiodic_timing_enabled = 0;
|
||||
vnf.p7_vnfs[0].periodic_timing_period = 10;
|
||||
vnf.p7_vnfs[0].config = nfapi_vnf_p7_config_create();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user