more debugging for RA procedures for eMTC

This commit is contained in:
Raymond Knopp
2017-11-16 09:35:39 +01:00
parent 71dbefe981
commit 97097a8c49
4 changed files with 11 additions and 4 deletions
+1
View File
@@ -917,6 +917,7 @@ typedef struct {
#ifdef Rel14
uint8_t rach_resource_type;
uint8_t msg2_mpdcch_repetition_cnt;
uint8_t msg2_mpdcch_done;
uint8_t msg4_mpdcch_repetition_cnt;
uint8_t msg2_narrowband;
uint8_t msg34_narrowband;
+6 -2
View File
@@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ generate_Msg2 (module_id_t module_idP, int CC_idP, frame_t frameP, sub_frame_t s
first_rb = narrowband_to_first_rb (&cc[CC_idP], RA_template->msg2_narrowband);
if ((RA_template->msg2_mpdcch_repetition_cnt == 0) && (mpdcch_sf_condition (eNB, CC_idP, frameP, subframeP, rmax, TYPE2, -1) > 0)) {
RA_template->msg2_mpdcch_done = 0;
// MPDCCH configuration for RAR
LOG_I (MAC, "[eNB %d][RAPROC] Frame %d, Subframe %d : In generate_Msg2 for CE Level %d, Programming MPDCCH %d repetitions\n", module_idP, frameP, subframeP, RA_template->rach_resource_type-1,reps);
@@ -308,7 +309,9 @@ generate_Msg2 (module_id_t module_idP, int CC_idP, frame_t frameP, sub_frame_t s
if (RA_template->msg2_mpdcch_repetition_cnt > 0) { // we're in a stream of repetitions
if (RA_template->msg2_mpdcch_repetition_cnt == reps) { // this is the last mpdcch repetition
if ((RA_template->msg2_mpdcch_repetition_cnt == reps)&&
(RA_template->msg2_mpdcch_done == 0)){ // this is the last mpdcch repetition
RA_template->msg2_mpdcch_done = 1;
if (cc[CC_idP].tdd_Config == NULL) { // FDD case
// wait 2 subframes for PDSCH transmission
if (subframeP > 7)
@@ -329,7 +332,7 @@ generate_Msg2 (module_id_t module_idP, int CC_idP, frame_t frameP, sub_frame_t s
if ((RA_template->Msg2_frame == frameP) && (RA_template->Msg2_subframe == subframeP)) {
// Program PDSCH
LOG_I (MAC, "[eNB %d][RAPROC] Frame %d, Subframe %d : In generate_Msg2, Programming PDSCH %d\n", module_idP, frameP, subframeP);
LOG_I (MAC, "[eNB %d][RAPROC] Frame %d, Subframe %d : In generate_Msg2, Programming PDSCH\n", module_idP, frameP, subframeP);
RA_template->generate_rar = 0;
dl_config_pdu = &dl_req->dl_config_pdu_list[dl_req->number_pdu];
@@ -373,6 +376,7 @@ generate_Msg2 (module_id_t module_idP, int CC_idP, frame_t frameP, sub_frame_t s
add_msg3 (module_idP, CC_idP, RA_template, frameP, subframeP);
fill_rar_br (eNB, CC_idP, RA_template, frameP, subframeP, cc[CC_idP].RAR_pdu.payload, RA_template->rach_resource_type - 1);
// DL request
LOG_I (MAC, "[eNB %d][RAPROC] Frame %d, Subframe %d : In generate_Msg2, Programming TX Req %d\n", module_idP, frameP, subframeP);
eNB->TX_req[CC_idP].sfn_sf = (frameP << 4) + subframeP;
TX_req = &eNB->TX_req[CC_idP].tx_request_body.tx_pdu_list[eNB->TX_req[CC_idP].tx_request_body.number_of_pdus];
TX_req->pdu_length = 7; // This should be changed if we have more than 1 preamble