maki/openairinterface5g
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

CI: use svr_id for Ping in RFsim-based tests

Browse Source 
This is not really used as of now, because most IPs are hardcoded. See
one of the next commits for the use of this.

To make sure that we have the correct IP, there is some code that
verifies that a hardcoded IP and the CN IP would be the same.

Note: need two separate ci_infra.yaml entries, because
- for FlexRIC, the container name is different (is the tutorial CN)
- for RFsim5G E1, we don't have ext-dn => ping UPF
This commit is contained in:
Robert Schmidt
2025-03-31 16:38:13 +02:00
parent a51190a7c5
commit 98ac540d57
21 changed files with 101 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
ci-scripts/xml_files/container_5g_rfsim.xml
+13 -1
View File
@@ -141,6 +141,8 @@
<desc>Ping ext-dn from NR-UE</desc>
<id>rfsim5g_ue</id>
<nodes>cacofonix</nodes>
<svr_id>rfsim5g_ext_dn</svr_id>
<svr_node>cacofonix</svr_node>
<ping_args> -c 20 -i 0.25 192.168.72.135</ping_args>
<ping_packetloss_threshold>5</ping_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
@@ -150,7 +152,9 @@
<desc>Ping NR-UE from ext-dn</desc>
<id>rfsim5g_ext_dn</id>
<nodes>cacofonix</nodes>
<ping_args>-c 20 -i 0.25 12.1.1.2</ping_args>
<svr_id>rfsim5g_ue</svr_id>
<svr_node>cacofonix</svr_node>
<ping_args>-c 20 -i 0.25 12.1.1.2</ping_args> <!-- should be %cn_ip%?? -->
<ping_packetloss_threshold>5</ping_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
@@ -159,6 +163,8 @@
<desc>Ping ext-dn from Second NR-UE</desc>
<id>rfsim5g_ue2</id>
<nodes>cacofonix</nodes>
<svr_id>rfsim5g_ext_dn</svr_id>
<svr_node>cacofonix</svr_node>
<ping_args> -c 20 -i 0.25 192.168.72.135</ping_args>
<ping_packetloss_threshold>5</ping_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
@@ -168,6 +174,8 @@
<desc>Ping Second NR-UE from ext-dn</desc>
<id>rfsim5g_ext_dn</id>
<nodes>cacofonix</nodes>
<svr_id>rfsim5g_ue2</svr_id>
<svr_node>cacofonix</svr_node>
<ping_args>-c 20 -i 0.25 12.1.1.3</ping_args>
<ping_packetloss_threshold>5</ping_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
@@ -177,6 +185,8 @@
<desc>Ping ext-dn from both UEs</desc>
<id>rfsim5g_ue rfsim5g_ue2</id>
<nodes>cacofonix cacofonix</nodes>
<svr_id>rfsim5g_ext_dn</svr_id>
<svr_node>cacofonix</svr_node>
<ping_args>-c 20 -i 0.25 192.168.72.135</ping_args>
<ping_packetloss_threshold>5</ping_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>
@@ -186,6 +196,8 @@
<desc>Ping ext-dn from all UEs</desc>
<id>rfsim5g_ue rfsim5g_ue2 rfsim5g_ue3 rfsim5g_ue4 rfsim5g_ue5 rfsim5g_ue6 rfsim5g_ue7 rfsim5g_ue8 rfsim5g_ue9 rfsim5g_ue10</id>
<nodes>cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix cacofonix</nodes>
<svr_id>rfsim5g_ext_dn</svr_id>
<svr_node>cacofonix</svr_node>
<ping_args>-c 20 192.168.72.135 -i 0.25 -s 1016</ping_args>
<ping_packetloss_threshold>5</ping_packetloss_threshold>
</testCase>