better handling of PRACH TX power to improve separation between PHY and MAC

This commit is contained in:
francescomani
2022-10-29 14:16:12 +02:00
parent c9553fe696
commit c07cbce037
23 changed files with 151 additions and 219 deletions
+12 -1
View File
@@ -1085,6 +1085,14 @@ int handle_dci(module_id_t module_id, int cc_id, unsigned int gNB_index, frame_t
}
void handle_ssb_meas(NR_UE_MAC_INST_t *mac, uint8_t ssb_index, int16_t rsrp_dbm, int16_t pathloss) {
mac->phy_measurements.ssb_index = ssb_index;
mac->phy_measurements.ssb_rsrp_dBm = rsrp_dbm;
mac->phy_measurements.pathloss = pathloss;
}
// L2 Abstraction Layer
// Note: sdu should always be processed because data and timing advance updates are transmitted by the UE
int8_t handle_dlsch(nr_downlink_indication_t *dl_info, NR_UL_TIME_ALIGNMENT_t *ul_time_alignment, int pdu_id){
@@ -1225,7 +1233,10 @@ int nr_ue_dl_indication(nr_downlink_indication_t *dl_info, NR_UL_TIME_ALIGNMENT_
switch(dl_info->rx_ind->rx_indication_body[i].pdu_type){
case FAPI_NR_RX_PDU_TYPE_SSB:
mac->ssb_rsrp_dBm = (dl_info->rx_ind->rx_indication_body+i)->ssb_pdu.rsrp_dBm;
handle_ssb_meas(mac,
(dl_info->rx_ind->rx_indication_body+i)->ssb_pdu.ssb_index,
(dl_info->rx_ind->rx_indication_body+i)->ssb_pdu.rsrp_dBm,
(dl_info->rx_ind->rx_indication_body+i)->ssb_pdu.pathloss);
ret_mask |= (handle_bcch_bch(dl_info->module_id, dl_info->cc_id, dl_info->gNB_index, dl_info->phy_data,
(dl_info->rx_ind->rx_indication_body+i)->ssb_pdu.pdu,
(dl_info->rx_ind->rx_indication_body+i)->ssb_pdu.additional_bits,