simplify and make better performance the mutual exclusion of processSlotTX() function
This commit is contained in:
+17
-19
@@ -526,6 +526,14 @@ void processSlotTX(void *arg)
|
||||
PHY_VARS_NR_UE *UE = rxtxD->UE;
|
||||
nr_phy_data_tx_t phy_data = {0};
|
||||
|
||||
// Force sequential execution, even if we launch in // for all slots
|
||||
// at least ULstatus variable is a pure race condition that is quickly detected by assert() in the code because one thread sets it
|
||||
// to active, so the other thread try to steal&run the ul work
|
||||
if (rxtxD->stream_status == 2) {
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_elt_t *res = pullNotifiedFIFO(UE->tx_resume_ind_fifo + proc->nr_slot_tx);
|
||||
delNotifiedFIFO_elt(res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (UE->if_inst)
|
||||
UE->if_inst->slot_indication(UE->Mod_id);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -560,11 +568,6 @@ void processSlotTX(void *arg)
|
||||
instead,
|
||||
we may run in place the processSlotTX() when the conditions are met (when a decreasing tx_wait_for_dlsch[slot] will become 0)
|
||||
It will remove the condition signals (for a thread safe semaphore or counter) and make the system simpler
|
||||
This require also other modifications to
|
||||
remove txFifo that is also a big issue
|
||||
add out of order RF board sending, because,
|
||||
if we encode and send tx slot as soon as we can,
|
||||
it will be thrown out of order, especially in TDD mode
|
||||
*/
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_elt_t *res = pollNotifiedFIFO(UE->tx_resume_ind_fifo + proc->nr_slot_tx);
|
||||
if (res)
|
||||
@@ -590,6 +593,11 @@ void processSlotTX(void *arg)
|
||||
phy_procedures_nrUE_TX(UE, proc, &phy_data);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_elt_t *newElt = newNotifiedFIFO_elt(sizeof(int), 0, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
int *msgData = (int *)NotifiedFifoData(newElt);
|
||||
int newslot = (proc->nr_slot_tx + 1) % UE->frame_parms.slots_per_frame;
|
||||
*msgData = newslot;
|
||||
pushNotifiedFIFO(UE->tx_resume_ind_fifo + newslot, newElt);
|
||||
RU_write(rxtxD);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -755,9 +763,6 @@ void *UE_thread(void *arg)
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_t nf;
|
||||
initNotifiedFIFO(&nf);
|
||||
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_t txFifo;
|
||||
initNotifiedFIFO(&txFifo);
|
||||
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_t freeBlocks;
|
||||
initNotifiedFIFO_nothreadSafe(&freeBlocks);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -937,25 +942,18 @@ void *UE_thread(void *arg)
|
||||
|
||||
// Start TX slot processing here. It runs in parallel with RX slot processing
|
||||
// in current code, DURATION_RX_TO_TX constant is the limit to get UL data to encode from a RX slot
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_elt_t *newTx = newNotifiedFIFO_elt(sizeof(nr_rxtx_thread_data_t), curMsg.proc.nr_slot_tx, &txFifo, processSlotTX);
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_elt_t *newTx = newNotifiedFIFO_elt(sizeof(nr_rxtx_thread_data_t), curMsg.proc.nr_slot_tx, NULL, processSlotTX);
|
||||
nr_rxtx_thread_data_t *curMsgTx = (nr_rxtx_thread_data_t *)NotifiedFifoData(newTx);
|
||||
curMsgTx->proc = curMsg.proc;
|
||||
curMsgTx->writeBlockSize = writeBlockSize;
|
||||
curMsgTx->proc.timestamp_tx = writeTimestamp;
|
||||
curMsgTx->UE = UE;
|
||||
curMsgTx->tx_wait_for_dlsch = tx_wait_for_dlsch[curMsgTx->proc.nr_slot_tx];
|
||||
curMsgTx->stream_status = start_rx_stream;
|
||||
start_rx_stream = 2;
|
||||
tx_wait_for_dlsch[curMsgTx->proc.nr_slot_tx] = 0;
|
||||
pushTpool(&(get_nrUE_params()->Tpool), newTx);
|
||||
|
||||
// Wait for TX slot processing to finish
|
||||
// Should be removed when bugs, race conditions, will be fixed
|
||||
notifiedFIFO_elt_t *res;
|
||||
res = pullTpool(&txFifo, &(get_nrUE_params()->Tpool));
|
||||
if (res == NULL)
|
||||
LOG_E(PHY, "Tpool has been aborted\n");
|
||||
else
|
||||
delNotifiedFIFO_elt(res);
|
||||
} // while !oai_exit
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user