This code has not been tested with a COTS UE. We need SRB1/2 (so we need SA)
to test.
The activation of security and integrity for SRB1 will need more code
(new functions) because it happens after some time, not at creation time
of the PDCP entity and there is no way to do this with current code.
In case of false positive PDSCH CRC check, a random MAC PDU is processed.
Currently pdu_len is unsigned 16 Bit, so we did break out of the processing loop only if we _exactly_ hit a residual pdu_len of 0, or we hit a LCID of DL_SCH_LCID_PADDING.
If we didn't hit either of these, pdu_len wrapped to a very positive value, and we continued processing the PDU even beyond its bounds!
This behavior was observed with SNR 1 dB and MCS 9.
So better make pdu_len signed and break out of the loop after processing at max. pdu_len Bytes!
The discard timer is used by the PDCP layer to discard packets that were not
transmitted to RLC after some time.
We don't really need it for the moment, maybe never for the default
bearer which is a best-effort bearer passing all kind of IP traffic.
Maybe for voice over IP kind of traffic it's important, or realtime
applications.
I ran an iperf UDP uplink test and saw no error on the PHY layer but still
lots of packets lost in the iperf logs, which was very surprising. By
analyzing the logs in wireshark I saw that, with the current scheduler,
an IP packet sent by the UE took 40ms to be sent piece by piece to the
gNB, and then the next uplink IP packet was never sent at all because
the discard timer was expired, leading to the high count of packets lost
in the iperf logs.
So let's put infinity for the moment for the discard timer. From my
understanding of the moment it's not a problem. If for some reason we
should set it to some non-infinity value, then we can change later.
- FAPI structures not to be used as config_req at MAC since that FAPI is
just for communication between MAC and PHY
- additional frame_type member added to the FAPI struct
In FDD mode, the UE_mode switches to PUSCH mode before the initial TA value was applied.
Because of this, the ta_command was misinterpreted.
Fix this by adding 31 to the initial TA comamnd and handle it the same as TA updates.
Implement data transfer (38.331 5.2):
- transmit operation (in nr_pdcp_entity_recv_sdu)
- receive operation (in nr_pdcp_entity_recv_pdu)
- t-Reordering expiration
To keep track of time the function nr_pdcp_wakeup_timer_thread has been
added and is called by the gNB's MAC scheduler via nr_pdcp_tick.
(The UE has not been modified.)
A thread has been introduced to set time of all the existing PDCP
entities in the system. This probably does not scale well with many
PDCP entities (many UEs connected to the gNB). To be changed at some
point when needed. Hopefully, with a few UEs this mechanism won't be
too problematic (ie. won't cause realtime problems).
The problem with time in PDCP is that SDUs are kept if some are
missing, to do reordering. A timer is started and when it expires
we have to transmit the SDUs even if some are still missing. We
want to do that as soon as possible. So we have to check timers
often (every millisecond).
In RLC the time is set when there is some activity (SDU or PDU
received). In PDCP we cannot wait for this kind of activity. We
would keep packets longer than necessary, which may disturb
upper layers (think: TCP). That is why we introduced the thread,
as a simple mechanism to keep packets no longer than necessary.
The locking done by this thread may create realtime issues.
The whole logic of time keeping can be changed later if it turns
out that it is not efficient.
The functions dealing with DRB AM have been removed. All the types
of PDCP entities (DRB AM, DRB UM, SRB) use the same mechanism for
transmit and receive operations. So the code has been made common
for all those types.
We don't deal with:
- entity re-establishment, entity release or entity suspend
- SDU discard (the timer is present but not used)
- status reporting
- data recovery
- data volume calculation
- header compression / decompression
There is no plan to implement those features in a near future.
Integrity protection is not done yet, and will be implemented soon.
Cedric Roux