If we are in one of these procedures, we basically must be in SA mode,
everything else is illogical. It also does not seem plausible to check
for this, as it is not apparent why only these couple of calls should
not be executed if not in SA. Hence, remove.
This implementation might work, but it simply triggers RRC setup on the new
DU when we might send a RRC reestablishment speeding up the whole
connection setup. For this:
- we should send the F1 UE context setup to the new DU
- we should still do the reestablishment, containing the reestablishment message
The latter should be sent once we received the F1 UE context setup
response. We don't need a new context. send a release to the old DU (and
don't release our own context!!).
We might also send the reestablishment to the UE encapsulated with the
F1 UE context setup response. Need to investigate if this is feasible
(because if the DU rejects [can that happen here?], the UE will still
send reestablishment complete -- what then?).
Also, we would need to send the E1 bearer context modification to the
CU-UP.
Keeping track if AS security is activated. This is important for a later
commit, where we use this to decide if we send a F1 UE Context Setup Req
with security command after receiving the E1 bearer context setup
response. The corresponding AssertFatal() removed in the same commit
implementing PDU session handling in NGAP Initial UE Context Setup.
38.401 Sec 8.1 asks for sending the Initial Context Setup Response after
a reconfiguration happened. Therefore, we can never send this message
directly from the handler in the Initial Context Setup Request
- CU-CP replying to the CU-UP with a Setup Failure message in case of unsuccessfull E1 Setup Request
- message is decoded by the CU-UP, and stops the process
This commit removes nr_rrc_mac_config_req_ue_logicalChannelBearer and handles configuration of logical channel bearers at MAC in nr_rrc_mac_config_req_cg.
This also avoids to configure LCs before resetting them again nr_rrc_mac_config_req_cg().
RRC Version is a required IE. Hence, implement the encoder and decoder
for this message. At the DU and CU, read the RRC Version we use and fill
the corresponding field.
Co-authored-by: Robert Schmidt <robert.schmidt@openairinterface.org>
For LiteOn DU, we do not receive the MIB/SIB1 in the F1 Setup Request.
This is not a problem in itself, but it might happen that certain
procedures are executed without MIB/SIB1. Check for it and handle
appropriately:
- During normal connection establishment, we might not be able to
calculate measurement config
- During reestablishment, we might not be able to calculate ARFCN SSB
and cannot do reestablishment; do RRC setup instead.
MR-2401 changed the argument to the init_nrUE_standalone_thread
to be zero instead of the ue_id_g. This causes every port to be
opened for multiple UEs to have the same value, therefore only
allowing one UE to be connected to the proxy. If the ue_id_g
global is an issue, we should open a new ticket for a proper fix.
When setting up bearer(s) through F1, the corresponding F1 message has
QoS fields for the DRB(s) to be set up, as well as for all flows
associated to this DRB. In this commit, set the DRB QoS field to be
equal to the first flow (it is unclear/unspecified how it should be set
up, based on the flows), which was not set before and therefore
contained unitialized data.
The F1 module uses this data, and in split mode, F1 message generation
failed due to uninitialized data.
Robert Schmidt