This fixes out-of-bounds access: nr_ulsch_16qam_llr, nr_ulsch_64qam_llr and nr_ulsch_256qam_llr.
For 256qam this also fixes incorrect llr calculation on arm: the existing AVX code for 2 REs
case produced results not in line with the rest of the code. A testcase check_2_res_256_qam was
added to visualise the differences which can later be used to revive AVX acceleration for 2REs case.
* In LTE there is logic that checks the thread configurtion with the
getters `get_thread_parallel_conf()` and `get_thread_worker_conf()`
in NR these getters are not used, only setters, which have no impact
- num DL/UL harq processes, bits for harq id in DCIs, set according to IEs configured in RRC messages
- removed going through all the harq processes before triggering nr_ue_ulsch_procedures in phy_procedures_nr_ue.c
- did not remove usage of MAX_HARQ_PROCESSES in init phase
Does the same change in the _mbms() functions as in the previous commit.
Also, simplify logic in netlink_init_mbms_tun(): directly use the id in
the interface. This requires a slight ID change in the users, which is
also done in this commit.
Instead of implicitly using a hardcoded prefix "oaitun_" interface
name, move that out to the callers of these functions to make it clear.
The ID still remains outside.
The "sister functions" nas_config_mbms()/netlink_init_tun_mbms() will do
the same change in the next commit.
Remove netlink code, and the PDCP_USE_NETLINK macro, as there is no
known use, it makes the code more complicated, and is simply "technical
debt".
In 4G PDCP, a subtle change has been introduced, in pdcp_module_init()
of pdcp.c. Looking at the diff of this commit, it can be seen that there
is now a new "else-if (ENB_NAS_USE_TUN_W_MBMS_BIT)" branch that is under
what was the "if (PDCP_USE_NETLINK)" branch, while the code fragment was
actually inside the "else" branch of PDCP_USE_NETLINK. This seems to be
necessary: previously, if we did not use noS1 mode and we don't use any
TUN (i.e., the eNB), the else block would set up this interface. It is
important that this interface is brought up, because if we omit it,
RFsim will not work. It seems to me that this interface will regularly
create some traffic; without it, RFsim will be blocked, and the UE
cannot connect.
In short, it seems to be important to have the MBMS interface, which
injects traffic in the RFsim side, which will unblock RFsim. The change
in pdcp_module_init() preserves the total changes of the if-else
(PDCP_USE_NETLINK).
francescomani