- num DL/UL harq processes, bits for harq id in DCIs, set according to IEs configured in RRC messages
- removed going through all the harq processes before triggering nr_ue_ulsch_procedures in phy_procedures_nr_ue.c
- did not remove usage of MAX_HARQ_PROCESSES in init phase
- Enabled configuration for number of dl, ul harq processes in conf file
- set "num_dlharq = 32; num_ulharq = 32;" under "gNBs" section in the conf file
- default values when not configured is 16 for DL, UL harq processes
- IEs in the RRC messages set according to the number of DL, UL harq processes configured.
- If value 32 is configured , then IEs related to num harq processes and dci bits also configured in Bandwidth parts.
- MAX HARQ PROCESSES set to 32
- for PDSCH - default setting in OAI is 16, according to 3GPP rel17 38.331 these are the possible configs
- if no IES are defined then 8
- if nrofHARQ-ProcessesForPDSCH is defined then these values- {n2, n4, n6, n10, n12, n16}
- if nrofHARQ-ProcessesForPDSCH-v1700 is defined then 32
- for harq bits in DCI
- DCI 1_0 - 4 bits spec 38.212, section 7.3.1.2.1
- DCI 1_1 - 4/5 bits according to IE harq-ProcessNumberSizeDCI-1-1, spec 38.212, section 7.3.1.2.2
- for PUSCH - default setting in OAI is 16, according to 3GPP rel17 38.331 these are possible configs
- if no IES are defined then 16
- if nrofHARQ-ProcessesForPUSCH-v1700 is defined then 32
- for harq bits in DCI
- DCI 0_0 - 4 bits spec 38.212, section 7.3.1.1.1
- DCI 0_1 - 4/5 bits according to IE harq-ProcessNumberSizeDCI-0-1, spec 38.212, section 7.3.1.1.2
- FOR HARQ32 , DCI 1_1, DCI 0_1 should be configured in UE dedicated search space. In OAI it is set.
Prior to this commit, there was a global variable baseNetAddress that
could be set independently through a setter and also through the
configuration module. This baseNetAddress (16 bits IPv4) would then be
complemented with two more bytes in nas_config().
However, this is counter-productive, as not only we have a global
variable that is avoidable (we can give the entire address to
nas_config() directly), but it also would not work with IPv6. Hence,
modify to give nas_config() the entire address. A follow-up commit will
add IPv6 support.
Does the same change in the _mbms() functions as in the previous commit.
Also, simplify logic in netlink_init_mbms_tun(): directly use the id in
the interface. This requires a slight ID change in the users, which is
also done in this commit.
Instead of implicitly using a hardcoded prefix "oaitun_" interface
name, move that out to the callers of these functions to make it clear.
The ID still remains outside.
The "sister functions" nas_config_mbms()/netlink_init_tun_mbms() will do
the same change in the next commit.
Comparing both functions, it seems that nas_config_mbms_s1() sets the
same parameters, assuming that in nas_config_mbms(), we set
- (UE_NAS_USE_TUN || ENB_NAS_USE_TUN) yielding true -> should yield the
same interface name
- netmask is hardcoded to 255.255.255.0
- baseNetAddress is hardcoded 10.0
So replace the call with nas_config_mbms() by setting parameters
accordingly.
I don't know about any user of the kernel modules. It is effectively
legacy code we carry around, for no good reason. Remove it for the
moment. If we ever need it, we can revert.
Remove netlink code, and the PDCP_USE_NETLINK macro, as there is no
known use, it makes the code more complicated, and is simply "technical
debt".
In 4G PDCP, a subtle change has been introduced, in pdcp_module_init()
of pdcp.c. Looking at the diff of this commit, it can be seen that there
is now a new "else-if (ENB_NAS_USE_TUN_W_MBMS_BIT)" branch that is under
what was the "if (PDCP_USE_NETLINK)" branch, while the code fragment was
actually inside the "else" branch of PDCP_USE_NETLINK. This seems to be
necessary: previously, if we did not use noS1 mode and we don't use any
TUN (i.e., the eNB), the else block would set up this interface. It is
important that this interface is brought up, because if we omit it,
RFsim will not work. It seems to me that this interface will regularly
create some traffic; without it, RFsim will be blocked, and the UE
cannot connect.
In short, it seems to be important to have the MBMS interface, which
injects traffic in the RFsim side, which will unblock RFsim. The change
in pdcp_module_init() preserves the total changes of the if-else
(PDCP_USE_NETLINK).
Remove function pointers that were used in the past to implement the
F1(-U) interface in 4G, i.e., to have different functions to handle
split/monolithic operations. As we don't have F1 in 4G anymore (see
commit 9dc2282249), we don't need the
function pointers anymore.
On that occasion, rename the 5G functions by prepending nr_ to them;
this allows to refactor the interface in 5G further (which is not the
focus of this changeset).
38.473 requires to reset UE-related contexts in F1 Setup Request, so do
it.
However, avoid resetting UE states in phy_test: it has preconfigured UE
which we should not reset. Note that if NSA/phy-test used F1, we could
likely reset the UE state here, as the F1 UE context setup would come
afterwards.
francescomani