This code has not been tested with a COTS UE. We need SRB1/2 (so we need SA)
to test.
The activation of security and integrity for SRB1 will need more code
(new functions) because it happens after some time, not at creation time
of the PDCP entity and there is no way to do this with current code.
MR !1054 : gNB_multi-threading_rework
-Replacing the existing multi-threading pipeline with threadPool library, simpler and more robust
-Updated dlsim to print stats to matlab file.
-Small fix for UE Ulsch coding.
MR !1063 : T_tracer__add_gnb_tracer
Minimalist gnb tracer to trace (for the moment) rxdataF when some decoding for PUCCH or PUSCH has been done
MR !1070 : nr_pdcp_improvements
Implement data transfer (38.331 5.2): - transmit operation (in nr_pdcp_entity_recv_sdu) - receive operation (in nr_pdcp_entity_recv_pdu) - t-Reordering expiration
MR !1076 : PBCHNRTCFIX
Issue Details: If bchPayload is changed to non-zero value, then the test case used to fail.
Solution: While final check against UE decoded bchpayload and input bchpayload, the AND operation with 0xff is missing along with RIGHT SHIFT operation for input bchpayload.
MR !973 : s1_subnormal
LTE update in S1 functions from Fujitsu.
-NNSF
-S1AP auto recovery.
-Handling unexpected messages.
-Fix memory leak.
MR !1048 : develop_SA_RA
-Draft and initial trigger of RA procedures upon SIB1 reception.
-Improvements on SA SIB1 reception.
-Get Msg3 from RRC to MAC layer (this fixes random Msg3).
-Fix Tables 7.4.1.1.2-1/2 from 38.211.
Implement data transfer (38.331 5.2):
- transmit operation (in nr_pdcp_entity_recv_sdu)
- receive operation (in nr_pdcp_entity_recv_pdu)
- t-Reordering expiration
To keep track of time the function nr_pdcp_wakeup_timer_thread has been
added and is called by the gNB's MAC scheduler via nr_pdcp_tick.
(The UE has not been modified.)
A thread has been introduced to set time of all the existing PDCP
entities in the system. This probably does not scale well with many
PDCP entities (many UEs connected to the gNB). To be changed at some
point when needed. Hopefully, with a few UEs this mechanism won't be
too problematic (ie. won't cause realtime problems).
The problem with time in PDCP is that SDUs are kept if some are
missing, to do reordering. A timer is started and when it expires
we have to transmit the SDUs even if some are still missing. We
want to do that as soon as possible. So we have to check timers
often (every millisecond).
In RLC the time is set when there is some activity (SDU or PDU
received). In PDCP we cannot wait for this kind of activity. We
would keep packets longer than necessary, which may disturb
upper layers (think: TCP). That is why we introduced the thread,
as a simple mechanism to keep packets no longer than necessary.
The locking done by this thread may create realtime issues.
The whole logic of time keeping can be changed later if it turns
out that it is not efficient.
The functions dealing with DRB AM have been removed. All the types
of PDCP entities (DRB AM, DRB UM, SRB) use the same mechanism for
transmit and receive operations. So the code has been made common
for all those types.
We don't deal with:
- entity re-establishment, entity release or entity suspend
- SDU discard (the timer is present but not used)
- status reporting
- data recovery
- data volume calculation
- header compression / decompression
There is no plan to implement those features in a near future.
Integrity protection is not done yet, and will be implemented soon.
Laurent THOMAS