Previously, the ue_id passed into the
init_pdcp() in the proxy would be 41.
This is outside of the bounds of the
nas_sock_fd array and would cause a crash.
This was occuring because the node_number
in the NRUE starts at 2, not 1.
In this commit we have updated the NRUE
to properly get the RadioBearer info from
the gNB. Because NSA and SA mode both use
this information, we have updated the SA
function previously in place by changing
the name to allow both NSA and SA mode to
use. This commit also updated the NR/LTE UEs
configuration files to with the correct
proxy IP address.
1. Changed hard coded preamble index(63) to soft coded.
2. Active UE will not be considered in gNB scheduging RA.
3. Added condition to process dci indication to handle multiple UEs.
4. Bug fix in mutex_lock (unlock to lock). It should be lock rather than unlock.
5. nr_ue_scheduler update not to entering into getting IP traffic to be transmitted in noS1 mode.
6. log update in checking the number of rx_ind or crc
Also, removed the check before calling the
nr_uescheduler that was associated with the
ra.state. Lastly, removed the DL_HARQ_PID
position change as that was incorrect.
How? Well, we had to properly allocate the
ul_config_req. We also had to update the
ue_get_rach function. There were several
places where the functionality would check
for a particular mode (ra, sa, phy_test, etc).
In some of these places we had to add NSA mode.
In the VNF, they start the scheduler after 3 sec,
this is sort of a hack, might want to revisit.
This commit also includes removal of printfs.
At this point we are successfully able to build.
Additionally, we can run the scenario,
however, it does not pass. It seems that the gNB
is not connecting to the proxy correctly. Just
wanted to push the progress so far. FYI, the items
that had to be changed to correct the linking issues
were the following:
- mac_rrc_data_ind_ue vs. nr_mac_rrc_data_ind_ue
- rrc_data_req vs. nr_rrc_data_req
- mac_rrc_data_req_ue vs. nr_mac_rrc_data_req_ue
- rrc_data_req_ue vs. rrc_data_req_nr_ue
- rrc_data_req vs. nr_rrc_data_req
The listed functions should be declard in the LTE/NR
UE directory depending on the functionality. Several
were mixed. i.e.: LTE functions being called in NR UE.
Also, removing siWindowLength, siWindowLength_int,
SIBType, SIBPeriod, and siPeriod_int from the NR UE RRC.
These variable were not used in the NR UE and are defined
for LTE only.
Lastly, in the NR_IF_Module.c of the NR UE, the global
variable def_dci_pdu_rel15 is not accessible. Need to
revisit this. For not it is commented out.
Laurent Thomas