The case securityModeFailure didn't seem to be implemented
properly, so I just removed it entirely.
The variable 'securityMode' did not make much sense, removed as well.
Plus for integrity, there was: securityMode |= 1 << 5 for nea1
and << 6 for nea2, which does not seem correct (I would expect << 4
and << 5 respectively), so it was properly incorrect.
'securityModeCommand->criticalExtensions.choice.securityModeCommand'
was accessed before checking that
'securityModeCommand->criticalExtensions.present'
is 'NR_SecurityModeCommand__criticalExtensions_PR_securityModeCommand',
which is wrong.
The tests 'securityMode >= NO_SECURITY_MODE' and 'securityMode != 0xff'
don't make sense/are unclear, so removed too.
So let's simplify this function, wrong in several places. And put
some AssertFatal() so that the code won't do weird things. The
AssertFatal() can be removed later and the function improved later
if needed. The case securityModeFailure can also be handled later,
but I think there is more work to do than just encoding the message
and send it to the gNB, so it's not bad to remove it for the moment.
Cedric Roux
b9f0299165