numerology fix
This commit is contained in:
@@ -644,7 +644,6 @@ int wakeup_rxtx(PHY_VARS_eNB *eNB,RU_t *ru) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pthread_mutex_unlock( &proc_rxtx0->mutex_rxtx );
|
||||
ru_proc->emulate_rf_busy = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return(0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ static void* emulatedRF_thread(void* param) {
|
||||
sparam.sched_priority = sched_get_priority_max(SCHED_FIFO);
|
||||
policy = SCHED_FIFO ;
|
||||
pthread_setschedparam(pthread_self(), policy, &sparam);
|
||||
LOG_I(PHY,"/////////////////////******************** numerology = %d /////////////////////////////////***************************** \n",numerology);
|
||||
|
||||
wait_sync("emulatedRF_thread");
|
||||
while(!oai_exit){
|
||||
@@ -1211,6 +1212,9 @@ void wakeup_eNBs(RU_t *ru) {
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOG_E(PHY,"could not wakeup eNB rxtx process for subframe %d\n", ru->proc.subframe_rx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if(!eNB_list[i]->single_thread_flag){
|
||||
ru->proc.emulate_rf_busy = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ extern void init_eNB_afterRU(void);
|
||||
|
||||
int transmission_mode=1;
|
||||
int emulate_rf = 0;
|
||||
int numerology = 2;
|
||||
int numerology = 0;
|
||||
int codingw = 0;
|
||||
int fepw = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user