bugfix in time domain assigment
This commit is contained in:
@@ -474,6 +474,7 @@ void config_uldci(NR_BWP_Uplink_t *ubwp,
|
||||
nfapi_nr_dl_tti_pdcch_pdu_rel15_t *pdcch_pdu_rel15,
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15_t *dci_pdu_rel15,
|
||||
int *dci_formats, int *rnti_types,
|
||||
int time_domain_assignment,
|
||||
int n_ubwp, int bwp_id) {
|
||||
|
||||
switch(dci_formats[(pdcch_pdu_rel15->numDlDci)-1]) {
|
||||
@@ -482,7 +483,7 @@ void config_uldci(NR_BWP_Uplink_t *ubwp,
|
||||
pusch_pdu->rb_start,
|
||||
NRRIV2BW(ubwp->bwp_Common->genericParameters.locationAndBandwidth,275));
|
||||
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15->time_domain_assignment.val = 2; // row index used here instead of SLIV;
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15->time_domain_assignment.val = time_domain_assignment;
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15->frequency_hopping_flag.val = pusch_pdu->frequency_hopping;
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15->mcs = 9;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -511,7 +512,7 @@ void config_uldci(NR_BWP_Uplink_t *ubwp,
|
||||
else
|
||||
AssertFatal(1==0,"Only frequency resource allocation type 1 is currently supported\n");
|
||||
// time domain assignment
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15->time_domain_assignment.val = 2;
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15->time_domain_assignment.val = time_domain_assignment;
|
||||
// mcs
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15->mcs = pusch_pdu->mcs_index;
|
||||
// tpc command for pusch
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ void config_uldci(NR_BWP_Uplink_t *ubwp,
|
||||
nfapi_nr_dl_tti_pdcch_pdu_rel15_t *pdcch_pdu_rel15,
|
||||
dci_pdu_rel15_t *dci_pdu_rel15,
|
||||
int *dci_formats, int *rnti_types,
|
||||
int time_domain_assignment,
|
||||
int n_ubwp, int bwp_id);
|
||||
|
||||
void configure_fapi_dl_Tx(module_id_t Mod_idP,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user