another bugfix in acknack scheduling
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ int nr_acknack_scheduling(int mod_id,
|
||||
nr_fill_nfapi_pucch(mod_id, frame, slot, pucch, UE_id);
|
||||
memset(pucch, 0, sizeof(*pucch));
|
||||
pucch->frame = s == n_slots_frame - 1 ? (f + 1) % 1024 : f;
|
||||
if((s + 1) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
if(((s + 1)%nr_slots_period) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1 + first_ul_slot_tdd) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
else
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@ int nr_acknack_scheduling(int mod_id,
|
||||
nr_fill_nfapi_pucch(mod_id, frame, slot, csi_pucch, UE_id);
|
||||
memset(csi_pucch, 0, sizeof(*csi_pucch));
|
||||
pucch->frame = s == n_slots_frame - 1 ? (f + 1) % 1024 : f;
|
||||
if((s + 1) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
if(((s + 1)%nr_slots_period) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1 + first_ul_slot_tdd) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
else
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
@@ -1275,7 +1275,7 @@ int nr_acknack_scheduling(int mod_id,
|
||||
nr_fill_nfapi_pucch(mod_id, frame, slot, pucch, UE_id);
|
||||
memset(pucch, 0, sizeof(*pucch));
|
||||
pucch->frame = s == n_slots_frame - 1 ? (f + 1) % 1024 : f;
|
||||
if((s + 1) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
if(((s + 1)%nr_slots_period) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1 + first_ul_slot_tdd) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
else
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
@@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ int nr_acknack_scheduling(int mod_id,
|
||||
const int f = pucch->frame;
|
||||
const int s = pucch->ul_slot;
|
||||
pucch->frame = s == n_slots_frame - 1 ? (f + 1) % 1024 : f;
|
||||
if((s + 1) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
if(((s + 1)%nr_slots_period) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1 + first_ul_slot_tdd) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
else
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
@@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@ int nr_acknack_scheduling(int mod_id,
|
||||
const int s = pucch->ul_slot;
|
||||
memset(pucch, 0, sizeof(*pucch));
|
||||
pucch->frame = s == n_slots_frame - 1 ? (f + 1) % 1024 : f;
|
||||
if((s + 1) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
if(((s + 1)%nr_slots_period) == nr_slots_period)
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1 + first_ul_slot_tdd) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
else
|
||||
pucch->ul_slot = (s + 1) % n_slots_frame;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user