Config options --reconfig_file and --rbconfig-file have been introduced
to modify the filenames of reconfig.raw and rbconfig.raw (e.g., in the
case of multiple UEs). These filen*ames* were to be prepended with
--rrc_config_path to set the path. In summary, three options were
necessary, when two are sufficient.
In this commit, change to the options --reconfig-file and
--rbconfig-file (slight change for harmonization with other options,
which mostly use dashes) to give the full path to the corresponding
files, and avoid to surprise users who would not expect to have three
options.
--rrc_config_path has been deprecated and an error will be printed if a
user attempts to use it.
- throughput test in DL
- UL throughput: 30s is enough
- increase bidir test time for more reliable measurement
- increase retx thresholds: 1% for first round is too low
The results of individual UEs (e.g., ping) is listed vertically, like
so:
| ping results | UE1 |
| | UE2 |
| | UE3 |
Where UE1, UE2, ... represents an entire box with results for UE 1, 2,
... For many UEs, this results in considerable need for vertical space. This
commit changes to something like the following to save space:
| ping results | UE1 UE2 UE3 |
For a single UE, this commit has no major impact (the boxes are not
stretched to width anymore).
A side effect of the previous commit's refactoring is that we mark the
pipeline as failed if a (packet loss/bitrate) threshold is violated.
Previously, the HTML would contain a "Perf not met" hint, but be marked
as successful.
This commit introduces more realistic thresholds for various pipeline
runs. The values are arbitary, following the performances in pipelines
that were marked as successful, but actually had performance problems.
They allow, though, a pipeline to pass following the normal performance
we saw the last weeks.
Jenkins is programmed to send e-mails, but most people don't use it:
- the mail has all results in the attachments, but it is clumsy to
navigate between mail reader and browser, and CSS is not correct
- there is no link to the actual results
- everybody gets a notification from Gitlab, since we also post it there
Also, everybody who I asked told me they don't like this mail. Let's get
rid of it.
These timings shifted slightly in an MR recently. Since it is only
micro-seconds, and these thresholds are much higher in the 60 MHz (1x1
and 2x2) tests, it is safe to increase.
Robert Schmidt