- move IMSI extraction code to function, remove FLEXRAN comp. directive
- refactor the code, esp. don't do deep if-nesting
- remove m-tmsi part (does not give correct value)
- copy complete IMSI info to UE context, decode in RAN API
Original Author: Xenofon Foukas
Changed formatting
does not compile
RS: cast to get rid of compiler warning
-> ImsiEpsMobileIdentity_t to ImsiMobileIdentity_t which is defined the same
way
Summary of changes:
- fix MAC indentation
- bug fixes:
- fix uplink over-scheduling
- fix CQI updating (it was done even when it shouldn't)
- fix rrc rel10 compilation
- some minor bug fixes related to ASN.1
'_' is not a valid character.
S1AP specs say:
ENBname ::= PrintableString (SIZE (1..150,...))
And X.680 (08/2015) 41.4 table 10 lists the valid characters for
PrintableString. '_' is not there. We replace by '-' which is there.
Connection of eNB to ppenair-cn has not been tested. There is no reason
why it would fail.
The problem that may happen is that when the UE does not transmit
on PUCCH (for whatever reason) we may get no signal at all, and
thus compute a very low CQI. Later on we may ask the UE to transmit
louder which may lead to saturation and more problems.
The solution is simple: don't care about CQI in case of DTX
(and NACK also, as done for PUSCH).
Only FDD case done.
For TDD it seems that:
- nfapi structures are not correct. See nfapi_harq_indication_tdd_rel13_t
in nfapi/open-nFAPI/nfapi/public_inc/nfapi_interface.h, all the cases
(bundling, multiplex, ...) use nfapi_harq_indication_tdd_harq_data_t
- the function extract_harq does not handle TDD
S1AP specs say:
initialUEMessage S1AP-ELEMENTARY-PROCEDURE ::= {
INITIATING MESSAGE InitialUEMessage
PROCEDURE CODE id-initialUEMessage
CRITICALITY ignore
}
So let's use "ignore", not "reject".
The online decoder http://asn1-playground.oss.com/ did
not decode a message encoded by the eNB because of this.
Only the S1AP messages captured while doing a simple connection
of one UE have been tested with the online decoder.
So, not all the S1AP messages have been checked, maybe some
instances of this problem are still there.
It does not seem to harm the actual UE<->eNB<->EPC communication
(because we don't check the integrity of messages or because
asn1c does not do it), so it's not a big deal.
Robert Schmidt