Commit Graph
1036 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
maki c28054a285 update 2026-01-14 04:27:37 +00:00
maki cf4ca86169 一旦 2026-01-08 09:17:26 +00:00
maki 01db9857c4 dec3 2025-12-03 13:51:53 +09:00
Robert Schmidt 6fe7581eed Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/cfra-no-msg3' into integration_2025_w48
CFRA: mark RA complete when sending Msg2

The current contention-free random access forces a "Msg3" (which does
not exist in CFRA) to be received by a UE. Sometimes, this "Msg3" is not
received (for whatever reason), and the MAC declare that RA failed.

This is problematic, as the spec says that RA is complete once Msg2 is
received by the UE. Since the gNB cannot know when this is, simply mark
it as complete once we sent Msg2.

We still send Msg3 in CFRA, which is explained further in the commits.

Also, improve logging and stabilize an RFsim test by reducing sl_ahead.
2025-11-28 18:25:18 +01:00
Robert Schmidt 1368bb5a5c CFRA: handle potential Msg3
Since the parent commit, CFRA is inconditionally marked complete on Msg3
reception (successful or not). This works because the current
implementation still sends a UL grant (see parent commit for details).

In this commit, handle Msg3 if received in CFRA (notably for TA and
power). Note that since we declare RA complete, UE->ra does not exist
anymore, and so an intermediate variable is introduced to capture the
CFRA flag. The code should be such that if we are in CFRA, we never
access any UE->ra variable.
2025-11-28 15:47:23 +01:00
Robert Schmidt 8ea95a0e52 CFRA: mark RA complete when sending Msg2
The current contention-free random access forces a "Msg3" (which does
not exist in CFRA) to be received by a UE. Sometimes, this "Msg3" is not
received (for whatever reason), and the MAC declare that RA failed.

This is problematic, as the spec says that RA is complete once Msg2 is
received by the UE. To avoid this, inconditionally mark RA as complete
as soon as we receive an indication of Msg3 (DTX or not).

Note that after this change, we still send a UL grant in Msg2. This is
because 38.321 §5.1.4 is not clear to me whether we should send UL grant
(it does not explicitly exclude it), and it says

> 3> if the Random Access Response includes a MAC subPDU with RAPID only:
> [...]
>   4> indicate the reception of an acknowledgement for SI request to
>      upper layers.

which is NOT the case (but then I don't know/think we can have CFRA for
SI request?).  Since it also works with COTS UE, I leave Msg3 for the
moment.

The reason to not directly mark RA as complete when sending Msg2 is
because of possible retransmissions in do-ra mode. In fact, in do-ra,
there might already be data awaiting. In that case, the DLSCH scheduler
schedules data _in the same slot as Msg2_, which the UE does not decode,
leading to retransmissions.
2025-11-28 08:29:44 +01:00
Jaroslava Fiedlerova 0f6b567ae9 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fix-reestab-ho-cleanup' into integration_2025_w48 (!3776)
Fix reestablishment after handover

- fix reestablishment by not re-creating LCIDs with priority set to 0 (see first
  commit for more details)
- cleanup code
2025-11-27 14:52:23 +01:00
Jaroslava Fiedlerova df041a0f8c Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/issue563' into integration_2025_w48 (!3703)
Taking into account UE capabilities for TBS_lbrm layers

Closes #563
2025-11-26 20:37:31 +01:00
Robert Schmidt b3c99d8ead Avoid recreation of LCIDs with wrong priority
In all cases (NSA, HO), we create LCIDs before the UE triggers random
access. Hence, process_addmod_bearers_cellGroupConfig() is not
necessary, as it just tries to recreate an LCID.

Furthermore, it includes a bug, as this function does set a wrong
priority (0), so the sorting of LCIDs is not correct. This in turn
creates problems with reestablishment, as LCID 1/SRB1 is not in the
first position, making reestablishment fail (where we assume LCID 1 be
in first position).

The actual bug of setting priorities is fixed in the next commit.
2025-11-26 18:18:25 +01:00
francescomani 10247cfbed taking into account maximum number of layers for PUSCH supported by the UE for TBSlbrm 2025-11-26 16:46:00 +01:00
Robert Schmidt 0360175042 Use UL functions for Qm/R determination
During refactoring, the wrong functions and correspondingly tables have
been used to calculate UL TB size. Fix through correct functions.

This should fix these error messages:

    3624774.778195 [MAC]    E (nr_get_Qm_dl:2034)             Invalid MCS table index 3 (expected in range [0,2])
    3624774.778207 [MAC]    E (nr_get_code_rate_dl:2066)      Invalid MCS table index 3 (expected in range [0,2])
    3624774.778211 [NR_MAC] E (nr_compute_tbs:63)             Error in compute TBS with a NULL input, returning NULL TBS

Fixes: 9449f777cc ("Remove TBS table and recompute on demand")
2025-11-24 13:04:02 +01:00
Jaroslava Fiedlerova 304c3ef9c4 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/mac-e2-ci' into integration_2025_w46 (!3752)
[MAC] Add UL total/used aggregated MAC stats; [E2 agent] Properly calculate
used UE PRBs in KPM; [CI] Simplify and improve the Undeploy_Object() and
implement Stop_Object()

- Create common dlul_mac_stats_t struct for both DL and UL total/used aggregated
  PRBs
- Use correct unit [%] for RRU.PrbTotDl and RRU.PrbTotUl , instead of [PRBs]
- Use correct unit [Mb] for DRB.PdcpSduVolumeDL and DRB.PdcpSduVolumeUL [kb]
- Implement Stop_Object() (docker compose stop = SIGTERM)
- Simplify the Undeploy_Object() function
- Improve the logging for Deploy/Undeploy_Object() functions
- OAI-FlexRIC CI: properly stop all the containers (one by one or a subgroup of
  running containers), and rename oai-flexric to nearRT-RIC container
2025-11-14 17:25:25 +01:00
Robert SchmidtandTeodora Vladić 021b546cf3 Add UL mac stats and create a common struct for both DL and UL
DL stats (aggregated total and used PRBs) previosuly used only for O1 interface,
now finds the purpose for E2 interface as well.

New UL stats (aggregated total and used PRBs) serve for E2 interface only.

Co-authored-by: Teodora Vladić <teodora.vladic@openairinterface.org>
2025-11-13 11:58:09 +01:00
Thomas Schlichter 8124203481 gNB: fix MAC TA command scheduling if measurement gaps are configured
In the current implementation, if UE transmission is interrupted via nr_mac_interrupt_ue_transmission(),
UE_sched_ctrl.ta_frame is modified to be the previous frame avoiding TA scheduling in the measurement gap.
So the next scheduled TA is shifted to be in 99 frames. As there are other measurement gaps before that,
the scheduled TA is always shifted, but actually never reached, effectively disabling the MAC TA commands.

To fix this, UE_sched_ctrl.ta_frame is changed to not indicate the last TA command transmission, but the
next one. This allows to check in nr_mac_interrupt_ue_transmission() if the next TA command transmission
is within the measurement gap and if so shift it to just after that gap.
2025-11-11 15:20:18 +01:00
Robert Schmidt 9449f777cc Remove TBS table and recompute on demand 2025-10-30 23:13:53 +01:00
Robert Schmidt 27a022d6f8 Fix: avoid retransmission with 0 RBs
Check and return, if necessary, that we have enough resources to make
retransmissions. Without, we can asserts in L1, such as

    Assertion (NPRB>0 && (NPRB + RBstart <= BWPsize)) failed!
    In PRBalloc_to_locationandbandwidth0() openairinterface5g/common/utils/nr/nr_common.c:506
    Illegal NPRB/RBstart Configuration (0,51) for BWPsize 51

which indicates that the scheduler requested a transmission with 0 PRBs,
which does not make sense.
2025-10-30 23:13:46 +01:00
Robert Schmidt 7ff05a98c2 Print frame/slot on UL failure 2025-10-15 19:52:09 +02:00
Robert Schmidt b60572d1fc Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/refactor-measConfig' into integration_2025_w37 (!3531)
Refactor measConfig

- Refactor and minor improvements in get_MeasConfig function;
- Add support for band in neighbourConfiguration (It is currently
  possible to handover cells with different frequencies, as long as they
  are in the same band, but this MR allows the handover to also be done
  between cells in different bands).
2025-09-12 12:39:44 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 99962b551c Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/reworking_BWP_configuration' into integration_2025_w37 (!3607)
Reworking BWP configuration

This MR reworks the configuration via fail of additional BWPs. Moreover, it
allows for a single BWP to be configured for a given UE at a given time (BWP
switch possible only via reconfiguration). It also reworks PTRS configuration
for consistency with the BWP one.
2025-09-12 12:38:13 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 743d342ad6 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/fixes-ul-sched' into integration_2025_w37 (!3635)
Fixes and updates for UL scheduling, notably DSUUU

Fix a number of problems that stem from !3521, notably regarding Msg3
scheduling, retransmissions in "UL-heavy" TDD scenarios, and BSR
handling. Modify a CI test to run a UL-heavy TDD scenario, and add
documentation for UL-heavy TDD scenarios.
2025-09-11 19:48:48 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 7c9a7ab374 Reset sched_ul_bytes on BSR to tend to overestimation
On BSR reception, reset sched_ul_bytes. This change means that we assume
that no data is "in flight" for this UE at time of BSR reception, or,
put differently, that we overestimate the buffer size at UE (in the
worst case).

To illustrate this, consider the following traces before/after this
change.

Before this change: Upon BSR reception, the estimated BSR of the UE is
reset, but the gNB still accounts for data "in flight". It is visible
that the calculated buffer size (estimated - scheduled) quickly goes to
zero, and we don't use all resources, despite the buffer still being
full. The maximum application throughput in this run was ~220Mbps.

    [NR_MAC]   SHORT BSR at  773.19, est buf 300000
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774. 6 RNTI af8e UL sched  774. 9 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 32797 est 300000 sched 152704 est BSR 147296 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774. 6 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.11 PRB start  0:162 TDA  4 TBS 7172 est 300000 sched 159876 est BSR 140124 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774.10 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.12 PRB start  0:162 TDA  0 TBS 32797 est 292845 sched 185501 est BSR 107344 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774.10 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.13 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 32797 est 292845 sched 218298 est BSR  74547 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774.11 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.14 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 32797 est 260117 sched 218298 est BSR  41819 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774.11 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.16 PRB start  0:162 TDA  4 TBS 7172 est 260117 sched 225470 est BSR  34647 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774.15 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.17 PRB start  0: 35 TDA  0 TBS 7172 est 220236 sched 185501 est BSR  34735 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774.15 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.18 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 32797 est 220236 sched 218298 est BSR   1938 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  774.16 RNTI af8e UL sched  774.19 PRB start  0: 10 TDA  2 TBS 2017 est 187508 sched 187518 est BSR    -10 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   SHORT BSR at  774. 9, est buf 300000
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  775. 0 RNTI af8e UL sched  775. 2 PRB start  0:162 TDA  0 TBS 32797 est 260117 sched 147549 est BSR 112568 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  775. 0 RNTI af8e UL sched  775. 3 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 32797 est 260117 sched 180346 est BSR  79771 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  775. 1 RNTI af8e UL sched  775. 4 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 32797 est 227389 sched 180346 est BSR  47043 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  775. 1 RNTI af8e UL sched  775. 6 PRB start  0:162 TDA  4 TBS 7172 est 227389 sched 187518 est BSR  39871 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  775. 5 RNTI af8e UL sched  775. 7 PRB start  0:162 TDA  0 TBS 32797 est 180353 sched 173174 est BSR   7179 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:  775. 5 RNTI af8e UL sched  775. 8 PRB start  0: 36 TDA  2 TBS 7298 est 180353 sched 180472 est BSR   -119 TPC 1

After this change: The gNB resets the number of bytes "in flight"
(sched). Thus, the calculated buffer is larger, and does not "run out"
before a new BSR arrives (which still indicates the maximum). The UE is
thus allocated all resources, but we might overestimate some resources.
The maximum application throughput in this run was ~300Mbps, limited by
MCS and not by estimated buffer size as in the previous case.

    [NR_MAC]   SHORT BSR at   43. 3, est buf 300000
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   43.15 RNTI d3ea UL sched   43.17 PRB start  0:162 TDA  0 TBS 36897 est 263180 sched  36897 est BSR 226283 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   43.15 RNTI d3ea UL sched   43.18 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 36897 est 263180 sched  73794 est BSR 189386 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   43.16 RNTI d3ea UL sched   43.19 PRB start 12:150 TDA  2 TBS 33822 est 263180 sched 107616 est BSR 155564 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   43.16 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44. 1 PRB start  0:162 TDA  4 TBS 7941 est 263180 sched 115557 est BSR 147623 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44. 1 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44. 3 PRB start  0:162 TDA  0 TBS 36897 est 173698 sched  25881 est BSR 147817 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44. 1 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44. 4 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 36897 est 173698 sched  62778 est BSR 110920 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44. 1 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44. 6 PRB start  0:162 TDA  4 TBS 7941 est 173698 sched  70719 est BSR 102979 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   SHORT BSR at   43.13, est buf 300000
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44. 5 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44. 7 PRB start  0:162 TDA  0 TBS 36897 est 292079 sched  36897 est BSR 255182 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44. 5 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44. 8 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 36897 est 292079 sched  73794 est BSR 218285 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44. 6 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44. 9 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 36897 est 292079 sched 110691 est BSR 181388 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44. 6 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44.11 PRB start  0:162 TDA  4 TBS 7941 est 292079 sched 118632 est BSR 173447 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44.10 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44.12 PRB start  0:162 TDA  0 TBS 36897 est 213587 sched  39972 est BSR 173615 TPC 1
    [NR_MAC]   ULSCH/PUSCH:   44.10 RNTI d3ea UL sched   44.13 PRB start  0:162 TDA  2 TBS 36897 est 213587 sched  76869 est BSR 136718 TPC 1
2025-09-11 19:47:52 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 89ebbb4192 Do not trigger ul failure in measgap scheduling and standardize the verification if MAC is active in other scheduling functions 2025-09-11 11:49:31 +01:00
Francesco Mani 67cb3f026d Save PUSCH information for each (re-)transmission
Instead of only saving this information in the first transmission, also
store it on each retransmission. This should ensure that if some
information changes, we always relate to the last transmission. For
instance, power control information might have changed, and should be
considered in subsequent rounds, if necessary. It also simplifies code.

Fixes: 6294ce715e ("Reorder pf_ul to process retransmission")
2025-09-09 20:01:04 +02:00
Thomas Schlichter e70bb45ebd gNB: consider the measured PUSCH SNR when computing the UL MCS if only one round is used 2025-09-09 11:17:43 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 11a561cb7b Ensure that retransmission uses TDA as indicated
Previously, the TDA reuse condition was wrong: for multiple TDAs with
different k2, the symbol allocation might be the same, in which the
previous logic was using the wrong TDA. Fix the condition, and insert an
assert to ensure the allocated TDA is correct.
2025-09-05 09:14:02 +02:00
francescomani 7300a7daf3 option to trigger reconfiguration with BWP switching 2025-09-04 18:43:12 +02:00
Robert Schmidt e69ef1d8cc UL scheduler log: print TDA, it has more info 2025-09-02 09:57:32 +02:00
francescomani 169de8cdca remove unnecessary input in get_cce_index 2025-09-01 17:17:06 +02:00
Robert Schmidt b11354126f Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/t-gnb-mac' into integration_2025_w35 (!3538)
add a new graphical T tracer to see gNB MAC scheduling decisions

May be useful for debugging
2025-08-27 15:14:55 +02:00
Rúben Soares Silva f1fbf4aa29 Skip unpacking SRS.indication TLV when report type is 0
Move the check for timing advance offset being 0xffff to before locking the scheduler
2025-08-22 15:33:35 +01:00
Cedric Roux c4562df2e7 T: add some traces
To be used by next commit.
2025-08-18 15:26:10 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 47a961d876 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/refactor-ulsch' into integration_2025_w33 (!3521)
Refactor ULSCH scheduler towards more TDD pattern flexibility

Refactors ULSCH scheduler, notably to support "UL-heavy" TDD patterns,
e.g., DSUUU. Also allows to run TDD pattern2 with UL slots, which was a
limitation in the previous code.
2025-08-14 14:30:58 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 6981783ee1 Select best out of multiple TDAs
A new function get_best_ul_tda() allows to select the "best" TDA out of
a number of TDA. Specifically, get_best_ul_tda() considers in how many
RBs a given TDA might be allocated, and multiplies this number of RBs
with the number of symbols in the TDA to form a "score". The TDA with
the best "score" is selected, considering it maximizes resource usage.

In phytest scheduler, we use this function to verify that the given TDA
can be really allocated in all selected slots.
2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 98cc36430b Schedule SRS longer in advance, cleanup
Schedule SRS longer in advance, so that it would also be enough even
with big k2 for UL TDA.

Remove useless types: we do not use the information on sched_srs
anymore, so remove it.

Check that the VRB map is free before making allocations.
2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Robert Schmidt cf8099fab1 Refactor TDA allocation: scheduler can take advantage of multiple k2
Add multiple TDAs with k2 larger than the min_rxtxtime, to potentially
allow to allocate all available slots. For this, nr_rrc_config_ul_tda()
inspects the TDD pattern, and allocates as many TDAs as necessary. It
also sorts the TDA list, with smaller k2 and larger symbol lengths
first.

This in turn is now used by get_num_ul_tda() to use a k2 and the slot
configuration to find a suitable TDA, assuming a list as sorted in
nr_rrc_config_ul_tda().

Note that since get_num_ul_tda() does only inspect the available UL
slots, there might be overlap (e.g., when scheduling SRS), which will be
fixed in a follow-up commit.

Also, TDD pattern 2 is not handled here yet, and a follow-up commit will
fix it.
2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 3102068e71 Add ULSCH preprocessor slot logic for scheduling multiple slots
Add a loop to advance slots as determined by current ("DL") slot, and
advance further into the future (for "UL" slots) if TDAs allow. Ensure
to schedule all TDAs if it's the last DL slot, to guarantee a previously
scheduled TDA will also reoccur (i.e., for guaranteeing that
retransmissions can be made).

Note that the check for number of UE being zero is removed, as this
allows to keep "ul_next" close to the "min_next" slot. This way, we can
use fs_get_max(); otherwise, if we did not always execute this loop,
they might diverge far from each other, making the logic inside the loop
more complicated.

This commit introduces a new type "fsn_t" (frame-slot number) that
encapsulates a single frame-slot combination in a single struct. The
helper functions (in gNB_scheduler_ulsch.c) should be moved to a new
file under common/, but we don't do this here to limit the amount of
code changes.
2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 4aea866b6a Use k2 to decide which TDA to use
For scheduling multiple ULSCH ahead, we will have to use different k2.
Hence, we will need to check for k2 in the TDA selection as well. The
function get_ul_tda() is renamed to get_num_ul_tda() to reflect that it
might return multiple TDAs (not done in this commit, but in a follow-up
MR). get_num_ul_tda() also returns a pointer to the first suitable TDA.

In the phy-test scheduler, simplify the selection of the TDA to use: do
not hardcode a specific K2, but rather, use the first one (with any k2).
2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 9059c0290e Provide selected TDA to pf_ul() 2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 948c0d5d2c Count and print failed CCE allocations for UL/DL 2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 5e734238c1 pf_ul(): report if UEs scheduled
For the multi-UL slot scheduling functionality in a follow-up commit, it
would be important to know if the scheduler allocated any UEs. If
pf_ul() allocated for some UEs, we might run it again on a different
slot. If on the other hand, no UEs were allocated, there is no point in
running it again.
2025-08-14 12:50:03 +02:00
Gabriele Gemmi ce06099a99 Configuration of FAPI Beamforming PDU for Aerial PBBF 2025-08-13 19:07:53 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 7cae3c2871 Comments on func 2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 62e4025bc8 Integrate inactivity scheduling into main allocation loop
Scheduling for inactivity only deviates in details from the main
scheduling logic: we simply allocate a fixed number of RBs instead of
making it dependent of data.

In this commit, add an additional flag to sort UEs that are scheduled
for inactivity in front of "normal" UEs (with traffic). Then, schedule
those UEs by limiting/fixing the amount of RBs to schedule to
min_grant_prb.

Update the comparator() to properly sort UEs based on this flag and the
coefficient by applying a consistent logic of -1/0/1 (see man qsort) for
smaller/equal/larger. The inactivity flag, if set, will always have
higher priority over the coefficient to schedule these UEs first, as was
the case prior to this commit.
2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 7ee8e8eaba Fix bug: only sort relevant part of list
This reduces the amount of elements to compare.
2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt dd98030202 Refactor to call post-processor in place
Remove sched_ctrl->sched_ulsch, and call the post-processing function
post_process_ulsch() in the places where sched_ctrl->sched_ulsch has
been assigned. This will have two effects:

- it is not necessary to have the final loop over all UEs, which might
  be costly especially towards many UEs.
- till now, there is only a single sched_ulsch; however, a later commit
  will allow to schedule multiple PUSCH transmissions from a single (DL)
  slot. This would require to make sched_ctrl->sched_ulsch, and
  also iterate through all sched_ulsch. In this new scheme, we can
  simply call post_process_ulsch() multiple times, which is simpler (and
  therefore, implicitly handleded as of this commit).
2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 4772dd889e Refactor ULSCH main allocation procedure
Write a single NR_sched_pusch_t structure in a single statement (where
possible). Assign to sched_ctrl->sched_pusch in one place, where the
post-processing functionality will be called in a follow-up commit.
2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt a469f42085 Refactor retransmission's NR_sched_pusch_t usage
Avoid to overwrite the existing retInfo. Instead, create a new
NR_sched_pusch_t and assign to sched_ctrl->sched_pusch in one place. A
follow-up commit will directly trigger the post processor here.
2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 5b39baacc3 Refactor inactivity-based PUSCH allocation
Write a single NR_sched_pusch_t structure in a single statement (where
possible). Assign to sched_ctrl->sched_pusch in one place, where the
post-processing functionality will be called in a follow-up commit.
2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt 81b66fae5e UL harq PID: similar to parent, reduce scope of sched_pusch 2025-08-04 09:53:14 +02:00
Robert Schmidt f3068caa37 Store selected MCS in UE iterator
PF uses MCS and average throughput to decide which UE to schedule. Thus,
the first loop selects the MCS, and the second does the main UE
allocation after sorting by priority, depending on the MCS.

A follow-up commit will remove sched_pusch from NR_UE_sched_ctrl_t.
Thus, we cannot rely on sched_ctrl to store the MCS in the first loop,
and look it up from there in the second. Instead, store it as part of
the UE iterator data, and take it from there.
2025-08-04 09:53:13 +02:00