Normally it is used to display throughput.
The computation it does is to sum up the wanted value for the last
second (1000 TTIs) and send this value to the views associated to
this logger, at each TTI.
- change paint function:
when the XY plot is resized we scale. Previously
the last range was put in the middle of the new range
(say when we increase the size).
We may get aspect ratio changes if the resize is not identical
vertically and horizontally, but I think this behaviour is more
'natural'.
- fix a bug:
the last horizontal tick label was printed to far on the right,
out of the bouding box of the XY plot. This is not totally fixed
in the case the label is larger than the XY plot. Now the part
out of the bounding box will be printed on the left. No big deal,
make the plot big enough. (Before, even if big enough you had a
problem.)
- add a new vertical tick display, to be used for throughput mostly.
See in enb.c the difference between 'input signal' and throughput
plots (those throughput plots will come in later commits).
The problem was visible when DL MCS was set to 20
(do a ping -c 192.172.0.1 -i0.2 to get it). The dots
were not plotted at the exact line of the tick mark.
Not sure the fix is always correct.
No big deal anyway.
A new logger is there: the "ticked TTI logger".
Similar to TTI logger (used by the PUCCH1 energy plot)
but takes another input, the "tick" (think subframe)
and a default value for when no event is triggered between
two ticks.
This is used for the UL and DL MCS plots in enb.c (next commit).
When the user clicks on "next UE" or "prev UE" we change the
filters of loggers.
At the same time, the main thread of enb.c processes events
received from the soft-modem and uses the filters, some of them
maybe in the process of being changed.
Changing the filters is not atomic and has to be protected.
Just below the logo you see the current UE, eg. [UE 0],
and near that you have two "buttons" [prev UE] and [next UE].
You click with left button of mouse on those and the various
plots that depend on the UE are now done for the new UE (say UE 1
instead of UE 0 if you click on [next UE]).
The plots are not cleared when you switch.
Let's say it's a feature.
Something went wrong somewhere in the commit history, the function
was not correct.
The most obvious symptom was that way too much SR (scheduling requests)
were given to the UE whenever it had some PUCCH to send.
The case for TDD has not been tested.
Florian Kaltenberger