The UE copies scope data not in a single buffer to avoid overwiring in case of multiple slots processing in parallel. But the scope upates data from single buffer thats assigned during selection. A getPlotValue() method is created to update the data pointer on every timerEvent.
DL config as array in MAC
Run RX slot processing in Tpool thread
Fixed race in phy config
Changed mac_IF_mutex
Proc Tx: Lets wait for Proc Rx to get ACK/NACK
-(only on slots that carry ACK/NACK)
Fix problem with rfsim
Separated PDCCH and PDSCH decoding functions. Run PDCCH decoding in main UE_thread.
Fixed race in MAC dci config struct
needed for parallel processing of slots
Moved DLSCH transport block buffer to stack
rx_ind as static allocation
L2sim: Fixed calling of MAC sched in wrong slot
Fix DCI extract bug for RA procedure
integration_2023_w13
See merge request oai/openairinterface5g!2037
* !1945 Free RNTI related structures at PHY after UE disconnection
* !2011 Creation of new pipeline LTE-TDD-2x2-container
* !1854 Handle reconfigurationWithSync
* !2019 bugfix: LDPC decoding in the gNB: clear d properly
* !2038 Fix DL 2x2 errors
* !2039 Adding test-case in XML to reset USRP in LTE-TDD pipeline
* !2008 Implement NR-UE Deregistration procedure
* !2023 Rework PDCP OAI API to allow custom SRB data forwarding (e.g., in F1)
* !2015 Update documentation: CI, general README.md, overview of doc README, various improvements
The GTP module is common for 4G and 5G. It hardcodes the functions to
call when creating S1U and NGU tunnels. The S1U case is both applicable
for LTE and NR (NSA), which until now was not a problem as the PDCP data
forwarding functions where called pdcp_data_req. The issue is that in this
branch, the NR PDCP functions have changed to nr_pdcp_data_req_drb().
When setting up a GTP tunnel, we now pass the PDCP data forwarding
functions into GTP, since the caller knows whether it is in 4G or 5G,
but GTP itself does not.
In the UE, we wish to handle ^C in the UE to send a message before
terminating, so we allow custom wait handlers to implement such
functionality. Use itti_wait_tasks_unblock() to unblock
itti_wait_tasks_end().
Also, implement itti_wait_tasks_end() using semaphores, as signals are
not async-signal-safe (and therefore should not be used in a signal
handler).
Robert Schmidt